I don't therit the 2.0. can have suit the BT.
a copy of the derp from die 9. Lachers &
9. Legend & 3r Mach (11457) in which he says that he
to
purposes
introduce legislation to bring the law regulating the registration & Trade marks in H.K. into live with the Imperial Act.
Act. This
dark soms astrous mixed & AUT
to
Ar why
both
Jur
(o) whether besitation & practice is identical,
to which the answe
in No
+(2) Whether 18.K. in prepared to make it
5
identent, to which the answer as seem
to be affermmation.
لا
"
*60/ 0009 *2-1801 *(LZES) 'M' 'V '80/11 '0009 '98-16002 **M "{OGET)
convention. I presume they
propose
cored by the suggested wording
350 an het
If the PNT.
siz possessous re in China or in the Chera
Ishd thuile that it and Japan Sen"
he as well to include the Strack also
if possible
he sad
obsons of
the Domes. Dep!
But I suffer
(24tel)
we ought to consult HK.
there points before returning
A
definite
answe
The 2nd point smised by the B ? is the exten
a the Convention to Colonie's other than H.K.
A ngand the Dominions, phone se
Domo o the litter to 70. Thereon.
241 17/09
Ao to other Colonies I thrill that the Straits.
may be expected to take interest in the
yes Heil
? consuet Sur J. Anderson.
Subject to any
uply that
regard tk. the suckered
copy of a duf from the for (sending 11457) indicates the latest views of the Col. En. hit that the S. 28. is communicating by tel with the fov. on the subject with a new to sustaining definitely: that IL. thinks that it might be advantageous to nichude the Straits that he has Alegraphed to the for on the subject,
that as
ngands the other possessions of It.My. it wer not seem
Convention to them
reccossy textend the
X
Sabheagh recording
A H K
Starti
1.
General Sept
JR 14/15
Mr Cox.
Porto Stang King grapes. As to