10 lon
smployment of Bi Studern, I
think we must refer to st king before
sanctioning his purther employment there
: Joh C.A. So
& uper & thong
JR 3/2.
Ho probably wouldn't
Hangtag,
jo
back to
he couldn't stay
there: & the saley parret for
new
affst and to less
و
Clea
A
that we can't let
Jprod then
I aper
C.a. engage
kin withart referring
6
the For: ? bok for:
? Ark for: Weather
there
woh- an
his if
he wishes.
tam fidos 1/2
hat COR
obja to mangaging
In view of tue cer. with the Govt. of H.K. gave
him when he lef* the Colony, of the fact that they fferred
him permanent employment, which he declined on the
ground of
the pay being insufficient, and of the acting D.F. W's report in
41340 I see no reason why C.A. should not re-engage
Hudson for service in
should suitable opport
It does not seem necessary to refer th
tunity occur.
Com.. Fr. Chatham, D. F...
told me he knew nothing
mat Erigh
A
against Judson, and there is obviously nothing against
27966 Fraal
109
260
hin. The Colony has done him a great deal of ra by
a carelessly and inconsiderately worded
report
o the O.A., which they in turn communica ed
to & Vessrs. Singer.
Of course Pudson may not wish to accept In
employment in 5.4. on the terms that may be
available
but that is for him to judge.
As to the general question, I remain of the
opinion exrrassed on 57748. Col. Govts. fre-
quenly say has y or ill-considered, things abou
a pan who has left their employment, and to
ornmuricate what they say to would-be employer.
may preclude a
unsatisfactory ex-Gort.
servan from earning a livelihood at all.
When a mn has a on rao a riven to him by
the Col. 30-t. i as in this case } the .A. should
add nothing to it. When he has no statement of
service, the C.A. should not report unfavouracly
without reference to us.
Arc
I Reft this in order taken the minites on the journal question which I have just cases. with Art Collais ash this case.
1.
Я
afrik
2. It dus me that the minute on the
Transvaal pater (27966/09) walther the foredr
and it is only
We assum
now for the Grumal
18