*ONA BTAA. 30 gnodanok ni rad baitcast I .si batTBM
Xoad sit de aniyada saw or neɗw Xxow em evig oft beau tofaeqenI
diskw sła od sono drew atlw yn bns I .entaedt gaiH gando aɗd to
grunth end to Xand arid da na?wtI saw off norw Todosqunl ødt
Motruo arit ton at to ai di Toridarte word dom oh I
Stely bna abandeud thoulé ddiw og od nemow dɛentɗ0 tot
•anaoqoru
OPY.
No.
Report.
6.
0
50
951
Rect & JAN 10
In the matter of Suspension Proceedings against
Inspector H. J. Knight.
We the undersigned Members of the
Committee appointed to inquire into this matter bag to report
-:tunina motosqeni vɗ bontmaxe-a8073
naw oď ti sa fool tom hib Jiatr rotoeqen?
.roupli to sonsuítal odd rebru
-:retata bellaɔot me? quot
sonofint sift Tebrur don naw drinkax todosijen)
ti word wont do ob I •mnsrod aid mh naw I asrlw morp¡I to
nar mı qarte toupil to somonttał odt rebror asw drybrcy modoeqɛnI
busfasal A * (.b?)
.fereas»-yozzot. A
7220 20* ***
as follows:-
1.
With respect to charge I we find there was
an implied consent given by the complainants to Inspector
Knight to enter No. 40 East Street. With respect to No. 45
East Street we find as a fact that Inspector Knight was under
the impression that this house which is immediately opposite
to No. 40 East Street was also in the occupation of the con-
-plainants. This is practically a finding of not guilty on this
charge.
2.
With respect to charge II we find that this
charge is partially proved only. The complainant Wong Sam ran
out by the back door of No. 45 East Street from mere fright.
There is nothing to support the suggestion that it was due to
fear of personal violence.
3.
We find Inspector Knight not guilty with
respect to charge III.
4.
Inspector Knight pleaded guilty to charge
IV and stated that many Inspectors are in the habit of using case removing coolies for their private purposes. The Committee
are satisfied that this practice is common.
(Sd.) F. A. Hazeland,
Attorney-General.
(sd.) A. W. Brewin.
(sd.) C. McI. Messer.
dated the 9th. day of November, 1909.