conseguen tal
with it.
on see 4 rotands & fallo
The Stutts //. bolli 11 his Cox
473
The Co. has hem bold that the S. 18.
arking the GW. por aport.
I think me might tell them that while
The
Just depi
has not get been reed we hav
Thes
JA
the aft htt
ASC
uport had a def sending home.
as amended after the first reading; day that the S.qS. cannot admit that the fort has no right to amend
the Die without their consent ht that he is prepared to write thin
obsons on the bith; pout out that with the exception of the ntorpectio
3 position is in no way damaged & the amendment, painti then acceptance & the amending ade
the
subject to further conson of the shorpectin
poson.
? Copy to It Kong miting
abors.
so apprecently, but $52 in volume
Graviti, The C
petition to to hand
850
Lappee
I was not clear whether the Tonways ord 1902 was
UBL
passed
that it
Was
public or privati bill - Sk 83 suggesti
خواست نگر
privati iste, but the cutificate required
by clause of the R... toho sent home with
privati order was not sent home with the
orju in question
have a "beyond bon" procedure
Possibly they have
in H.K.
cor bears here for dealing with Wills which affect both public o privati interesti
F
Tramways ades seems to me to be a
often kind.
and tha
WELL WE
The point mace to of importance, because if the order
is to h
vegarded
مصر
privati or hybrid
one
then may be something in the It.t. standing renders
X
& nouto limiting
ar
prescribing the method
of it's rusendment.
of the order is an
patie
Me
I do not see what then
is other than comones of police, good faith whe
to prevent the 11th heeyislation from amending
it ab Machin
time.
Afferentle, the only preria's amendment (ord: 32
passed (with the conscusiena
of 1902 1
Wa
the Company) in the shape of a public oder I wont not write to the compane, at panat
? Write to Jove
proposed
XIR.
8/1
of
川