hur Cox.
I spoke to
about this not
you
being
Scar
whether Lord Graun intended
to fortid the system
collect in
g
to object.
punishment altogether or only
to the present proposal.
As pointed out in the attorney General's report the puñciple of colle Wit punishment
Прися
in questio
Wthing
introduced
for the in 1888. The arrangement then provided
fer
was, havover, unworkable of this
omarance
Q
attempt to make the
System work in another manner.
When the 1888
Gree
received
9487/29
m it
I do not
Lord Knutsford besitated to app
(Sü
7. Branston, who knew Hong Kong *
}
muminted on the paper that the question
житт
had arisen
Cluize
his time &
that
the
in
whe incorrigible Spaders
this respect o
the caught.)
apparently, two cening
Lord Knutsford's despatch sound
that theilter
your despatch mor
Attorney General's report
an
the orfee
the
1 gives an explanation of the reasons which led to its introduction & looking
to the exceptional character of its provisions, the one to Hile,
معلقة للمسة مو
defer submitting
until I have received
1390-A. & E. W.-20024/26-6,000-11-08.
report from you
send this
Carry
it is in
band volunt
She has bee attone for
(+ This way
E. O'malle wt
might suff
Las H bet
beruchte.
explacing
CR
the circumstances which led
to the passing of an
character"
m
are
дво
so stringent 384
Sir W. das Voux' reply
1755-3/88 Lu
sanctioned
بات
the
обили се
I submit
a
draft
the
car
assumption,
that
адна
the
Lord Crave objecti
system but is withing to
to it's contumance in HugKing the form proposed.
theaugh not in
Laohewe
R. 2. S. 89/12/09. RES
I think cher Str bbs' draft
meet with you afferral. It substantially provide.
will
percedme
whi
бог
Ape
have
sanctioned in & africa
I concur
A
grave Meations
JB
24/12
the dift. A
سین
to the trd 4
< 30 XII