that he got pinked up in liep & 22 Apt.
There is
hopeless contradiction somewhere.
other wenst's affliation is distinct from Schully, in which care, all the remarks in the deep under vet about assisted emigranti and inelevant; or Schulty's treat's
Schultz's wears is are
idential in which case
we are told
© that the apptention
stay
von for indentured contes
assisted sniprenti cookes..
not for in den hired
I think we might point this discrepancy
out to So I hugard
explain
&nivik hun to
The other pout of importance in this deep in
the question of assisted eingration to setherland Indie
" I take it that what was
Ma
meant by
the phrase quoted in para b the for was not to bite to prosouls of skaid Dimitar of those made of the German Canal
a B Schultz. I don't understand it a
"forbidding the continuance.
(1300), WG 20,024–26. 6000. 11/03. A.& E.W. (12,528).,, 11,407—17.
17
7/09.
The
emigration to bother land hidin
350
?
dolphstein & In 2 Legend
I think that
JR.
120
the explanation of the
discrepancies to which tur Robinson refers
possibly lies cur
UL
fout that "asses fod coolies" who go aut nominally free, but really
under
a verbal contract
in dentures
o autor into
avival
are.
{
mally to all
that
a Chinese
intents & purposes indentured. (I hav been told by many perfete
cooly wormed regard the virtual contract
beepety hiding
a vitul affeement are
monomer, when
be and have.
away.)
but
3
on sh
back extremely rare
of
in Saura
difficulty in getting
адна
despatches mad together
Para 2
of the
,, 3
that
are
are Sa's unintelligible
eulisure in bar Fox's Shews that at Schultz
des in 32132. d
thing had spoken of
'contrant costies" hit 'karti
uforsed to Countin and asking for " "free "coolie
by the time the matter was the Jamans
wwwh
abpanctly "assisted"
while to
I doubt whether it is worth
to unravel the matter.
View
gthe 5g3's despatcher is wait by to and coolies
klausa.
Aus
regards the hetted and Ludies, I