me letters have
areiz
And impression
I am not sure that what is at the to tow
of it is not annoyance at It Metromme
M
ting prefered to 17 her. Jones. Lautainl
dee
nothing to give cause for
I M's rumoral to another post.
Jam
be writ
The CJ's remarks. to the Departy Regis han
an disposed by the EN.
? dipty that the S...S. has carefully considered the C.J's protest but that in mis sall
he devs no reason
to remar M
the ares the came
setter & cancel the app!
M. to another post at an carly portrun by And that the S.AS. gruo with Su 2. Lusaid
We can hans &
sub vilentio
A
to the litter the Deputy Repo
JRIT
I cannot find that the C. g. is legally empowered
to interfire with such appointments. to allow a properl! appointed fulfil the duties ghus Wrice is there case for applying tave Privy Camil
of he reprises to allow a
fficer to
no a
with a view to his reinoral.
BY 13/11.
Nont ro
All
HBY 7571
55
I don't suppose Sir F. Piggott will really attempt to prevent
Mr. Melbourne from performing his duties.
he
SAS.
A
nas
I would simply ask the Gov. to inform the C.J. that
received copies of his letters, and notes that there is
a difference of pinion as to Mr. Melbourne's competence
for the post to which ne has been appointed. Lord Crewe trusts,
however, that Mr. Milbourne will be found to discharge his new
duties satisfactorily.
Lnd Crewe
ASC
15/11
T
max
The affointment is rested in the for= but it we have been well if he had consulted the CJ before the afft. The strained relations between theme; entreg due. I think, to the CJ himself this no doubt sey difficult, if not impossible. In Melboume was calledti the English Bon in 1891 & is no fully qualified. Twones reff
MBL
15711
J
agree
617.x1
double
terposed..