Memo
4 19 Clements which appears to dispose of the possible danger. The Memo remarks that the royalty has been married, some 3 years ago on the ground that the wife & opium were with him, though we have read no other note on that.
In sec 57(4) this alteration has been made. In view of the explanations given by the Element, I don't think it is necessary or desirable to alter the royalty on morphine from $10.
Tel. ape #BL is quite competent. It doesn't like to go back to the old figure $30 per.
There is nothing else in the order to which exception need be taken.
? Sanchos 27. & want to send copy of 3524 to show that the Brit & colonies may be furnished.
JR $11. I regret to have delayed this so long; but in the absence of any assistance from.
The Exam was making the riding allowance. (1300), WL 20,021-23, 60939. 11/09. A.& E.W. (12,528).,, 11,407-17. 7/09.
The Itk. atty Sen? Took some JR $5/1 tent to double, I think 483.
This has been delayed by pressure of other work, and I have been delayed considerably but for Mr Robinson's labours which have lightened mine.
Shar how bren Koroneygh the order and concurs generally in his observations.
I do not think there are present any great points arising from consolidation.
Wr au his work 8.6.R.11/12.
I am much indebted to Robinson for it is most regrettable that upon this later stage have the burden imposed upon.
If the incompetence of Sir H. Berkeley at a time when the departmental work was particularly heavy. We have taken due notice of this neglect.
the draft the Liqueur more need say no more.
Ans & morphine satisfied if d o sad ful w. knew exactly what restrictions it is proposed to impose upon on the sale of the Drug (up to paragraph 35248).
I think we might send copy of 357248 to desents.
I think we might send it to B. J?
Page information is not explicitly present in the given text, hence not added.