137
Botrach. Ratt) gift „Poat bollekIyptonos na naw di card borrtotal
ale to drow wia dohw natiivat vituskočitna noɑtte: Vino sit at
med I bar
►
„Poojdna oris no notaigo na kaonqze bloo oriw drueb
ubuwrazta I es bolthe nag erit qerty sveď binora I be Ivanog
berto't I notakqo era sarta rtwosta eran aðgove aucupsadne bus
$
V
3 half days: the Court sitting on May 10th., 11th,,
12th., 13th., 14th. and 20th.
(111).
An appeal of the Imperial Bank of China lasted
2 days: May 25th. and 26th.
(iv). An appeal by Messrs. David and Company lasted 4
full days, and one-half day: June 28th., 29th.,
30th., July 1st. and 2nd.; and there is to be a
re-argument on one point in a fortnight's time.
20 medrede or det duo datog ouís Jalur I
.98*HODA (SW
5.
With regard to case (11) the fact was over-
and toe te violenag bhluno 358q yo no £Ibw boon no netistbroo
hirow RISA-IA. .Deportive vore .A v12 89 Brodva oʻz no malinow
<
wild of gałwn ti ar punktas: kot no arton birow ba wob tou od
aisa
7
VIS AMOR ,taignals of mudar os galvait labral to onbirt.
Isepja dzen ord LILý toro abament hfuo. tale,bras" od don blưoo
Iwoo monetetans wy 88 rst oe "I tofaree
edzi o8 BAW Walon ad end juffeyo! meris me of gyed blnov 1
Iptotherlong,etaloh wolacoom due malicou brdt,evitostøh yi-
**t mot berImmer swal bfnGo
Jakt eft,benang rand brut mendoa sté II
.A
PO UNŢCOUR
eroterede I botnsg ably Swods his kood eval bluow nodeapa
to scach 0 MA Broo8 cult rot notes:rioteł salwoffot aid brengs
yali zozta J**00 £IT end to Xrow and
Invab d boðaaf yag of n० q1H ed? to Issiqa nA .(1)
**I her to
+
odt datifw at noktakbeburg, Ivala'no al saso A .(t) *paioanne ed roofs.,boð¤oznénk saw *mecurevon
bus,ash £furt & betnel,tun? [Ist adé ozoted
¿
-looked, by myself as well as by everybody else, that sometimes
by agreement between the parties, a case is haard in First
Instance before the Pull Court in order to save the expense of
an intermediate appeal, and to allow the case to go direct to
the Privy Council. The Government availed itself of this provi-
-sion, and this was a case in which the privilege would be
allowed (see Ordinance 3 of 1873, s. 22); it would therefore
have been heard before the new Appeal Court.
Another case was also heard before the Full
Court, which involved a serious charge against a Solicitor.
The hearing lasted 8 days and a half. I have not however
included it in the above statement, as I should probably not
have made the necessary order for hearing before the new Pull
Court.
5.
It therefore appears that the new Court
would have been sitting on 18 working days; without making any
allowance