that undesirable.
Bagainst (1) Fird Legard says (para 6) that the practice with. in Efferent to that in the WK. aving to differences in the intuputation placed on the rule by the M. judges I can't say whether this is the
only on front
the rechang
case; hat, if so, it "tenocks the button out "anky pre in
M-Comput's 1st ofson to the proposed change.
to to the 2nd olon it in simply a question whether it is better to have matters to the discation of the judge or to the ford sense & parties to cont. Probally the former is safer. But the 1.2. proph want the change don't see that it w!, Do horn b
Im. Therefore propose
-5 dant!
Q
in prese
Cur
ang
appee.
affers the
introduction of byistation on the line's
of the Shanghai hercedure.
K278.
Ihr Gee Risky
3 ŕ seems
ద
www.
that in matters
of this kind the community shot allowed I decide the Haughing Chamber of Commerce represents that part of the community which has most-
interest in possessing a satisfaction
system of
Civil Procedur
class which is likely
thhe
& 4- iNolvad
in important commercial cases 166
थ
go whe
Hung thing marchent.
I it certainly rather have my case trint G a jury of people who
understand business.
than
Sir
7.
Piggott or eve
hi gampertiz
ว
Agna
to introduction
g
Will on lives proposed.
1901
R.5.5 27/8.
given to
(3 do not find from the
pakers (14229/01.62) that an
Special cans an this point)
hur Siddes
Xovellaration
Jager. of the people of It. hone, do not object
shid
of gare dating which with
to the considerath increase of gare, daty
probable, is thrown whom them, then is he reason
why thes, she not hoor trial by jeny extended
•proposed the Crown Solicitor (para 2) sac
time will h
10
• Difficentlig
think the preauth to the Bill i
objectionate
and wi fixat it's "ancasion. It sounds as
that by jery on civil cases had ten entirely
remedying
suppressed and the Bitt wine
an act of oppression by a tyranuscat goo!!
ac
!
And
getting jurais.
XJn.
2