&
bsyin yus nt,exolías nullübde neve swort,gxìbusi mort ba..."
A no shlanavo anton to,brenda ponoća gatna od droï andaSPO
ma? tch Mooh vịó th neid evad I „quila malo no dużaq of onATE"
að beð¿liring need for evs: maerul to war * maar oo8iona*7*
.stoffes .. *** aft neu"
espoiruq moltenbeurt tot Xid et agtuon 90"
sæla od at bus,nsabrio neattená na TO VALOTE sid et øref"
bfon sfather e be agtre Vst? Lanibait nit bur,KANSIJnen"
brod no bacsend 838med rady noaxed fore not entedo sia center"
Hear and duennevon „E
abdė mogu BRÅVERNAME to awitlátuada "te à seogrd no helztrech
$ buvesebi nao I get oron el troq debster#
Toxo ĐIÊw m-it more, vas halt tomrg I#
to dusanos wild rabror fagal al soldoeng abis 2am uratak Fly"
end, në Stedure Jor asuh mão "I
dalget to [ƒë e totesrigin? a zen tos vigila Luterol usoltem" A York og et 2roq nsnikaHÁ NA of eno vuorittw besocriq od bra"
.smit 002**
**Grot" be sloch won ul sfinkt,øtenos zal"
aqilla edentut oz vsi aline at beroon at ont datel on Jey* anotrafime" satengner breds on hos,OYANGABKAq bue aweto" Vilakolta vique eu 157 teonsikt sted mutyinna niskesy miszob" auoluatneo "za naeliw sabwland? supiterq holasty ħna bożnaqunt" 30 amaakay alle saburb,osed amit to at manseth engi¿ostni xo*
."brand"
SORC veit 100 si? no materikettier (0) sornutX hettal e. † to quirqbile to raceted add od rørsel eirit behtewto】 (0.1 „dontia Itädtebael „nunsvi -hebhe bre nežno!==0 sila not adadh do vrajanosä erit
od banuso at monetueertognl hum ysinh sloser tait enraggs 11 4* dobri,mnodutoli se qulikaveng me ano ante stworte autre dalt?¬{"
at nå nog aanvaartthus bits andłzareb noɑral!!!" niat qen" I-Lea^of sur ?i benildo vitauto ed blow Ilnwol 97 (18270[" Anetan era oanh khar ød oc estetigere deres blow so?450"
04
-abr
30457
"complained of by Captain Williamson".
This letter was forwarded by the Secretary
$4
of State to Hongkong on the 13th. June, 1904, and Sir Matthew
3153) Nathan replied on the 30th. of the following month referring 27046 to Sir Henry Blake's Despatch No. 237 of the 28th. June, 1901,
and Mr. Chamberlain's reply of the 6th. September, 1901, adding
"it seems to me that the United States Government are within
"their rights in imposing such conditions on the issue of the
"health certificates required at their ports of entry as may
"appear to them to effectually guard against the importation
"of disease, and, though there have been a few cases in the past
*in which these rights have not been exercised with tact, and
"one in which the discharge of a duly engaged seaman in an
"illegal manner resulted from his not having been passed by the
"United States Consular Medical Officer, I do not think that it
"is at present requisite that any representation on the subject
"should be made to the United States Government. I shall watch
"the future working of the system communicating with you later
"in the matter, if necessary.
3/53/
04
#
The Colonial Office on receiving Sir
Matthew Nathan's despatch replied to the Secretary of the
Chamber of Shipping on the 13th. September, 1904, as follows:-
"It appears that the system of inspection by United States
"Medical Officers at vessels about to leave Hongkong for
*United States ports is generally approved by the Masters and
"Owners of Ships, as it prevents the detention in quarantine at
"those ports, which would be insisted on, if the vessels left
"Hongkong without a certificate of health from the Doctors
"attached to the United States Consulate. The inconvenience
"entailed is, therefore, merely an alternative to the greater
"inconvenience (the risk of which it is open to them to incur)
"of being placed in quarantine at their ports of destination”.
"In the circumstances Mr. Lyttelton sees no reason for interfer-
"ing with the practice”.
Since