CO129-356 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [4-6]

DESPATCH.

21 JUN 09

Your telegram 14th June see my confidential letter Indian Railway Board, enclosure in my Confidential despatch 8th May as to the qualifications and period for which required of Railway Board satisfied that Lindsey fulfils qualifications as compared, I concur.

HBC

14. Fiddes.

21311

To 1.0 Conson

Aust tel q conf 13 Aug

24 June

Jo

1738-A. & E. W.-20932/27-- 23000--11-08.

Next subsequent Paper

113

I.0

21311

The period mentioned - after which it might suffice for (see Memo 19351) I think that it would be safer to suggest a 3-year period first. I would draft with the slight alteration that a lower salary would be much more suitable for Lindsey.

59H. 22/6

Page information is kept as is.

The original text has been proofread and formatted according to the given rules.

revised to

in particular to receive Their confirmation of the revised Estimate of Cost furnished by the railway. Not the Governor. No. Rugard. Tel. 1909 25th June Last Previous Paper. Lov 20418. HONG KONG 20740 Indian Traffic Expert. 491 C.O. 20740

has been revised to

HONG KONG

was not changed, as there is no clear indication that it should be. However, some reordering and minor changes were made to improve readability and adhere to the rules. The final output is:

in particular to receive

Their confirmation of

the

revised Estimate

of Cost

furnished by the railway.

Not

the

Governor.

No.

Rugard. Tel.

1909

2,5th June

Last Previous Paper.

Lov

20418.

HONG KONG

20740

Indian Traffic Expert.

491

C.O.

20740

DESPATCH.

21 JUN 09

Your telegram 14th June see my confidential letter Indian Railway Board, enclosure in my Confidential despatch 8th May as to the qualifications and period for which required of Railway Board satisfied that Lindsey fulfils qualifications as compared, I concur.

HBC

14. Fiddes.

21311

To 1.0 Conson

Aust tel q conf 13 Aug

24 June

Jo

1738-A. & E. W.-20932/27--23000--11-08.

Next subsequent Paper

113

I.0

21311

The period mentioned - after which it might suffice for (see Memo 19351) I think that it would be safer to suggest a 3-year period first. I would draft with the slight alteration that a lower salary would be much more suitable for Lindsey.

59H. 22/6