College.
I don't trust
be allowed to retire on
proposes
Le
th. Woodcock could horribly pension his transfer is
and
24
needed for the reorganization of
"Sanitary Ich". Nere appears to
the
alternative
but to
agree
be no
to the Govern's
proposal
ask for the Petitioners
? Do so
and
hat
Sta
Sqr
has
but regrets
unable
to meet their wishes
to be informed
Enquired
their representations
Carefully
Not he
(There
are
some enlivening passages
In the long enclosures
See
end
Page 4 in Encl. 2 and the last lines of Page ... with the beginning of Page 9.)
1. Woodcock's
Without knowledge
of the
work it is practically impossible to say how it is likely that
the work
The School will suffer. But H.M. Officers
used
to
act in
I think
As a
rule
I don't feel
happy at
this. I
Can't believe that it will be good for the College transfer bank with a
for the last 9 years;
has had nothing to do with duration hates the prospect of going back; and about whose physical qualification there is considerable doubt (L20234).
It is a minor matter, but I
with the permission of the Junior masters; and to arrange
in
to
I am be inclined to find this
the
Dr. 226
Offerson accordingly
AB 2746
are
a
kid
every (if it is
So
much
That the objection only the
does not carry weight
who is
Eg 18/1
the masters have long service (see the dates of entry which I have attached to their signatures.)
The Comparator appears to me to be absolutely convincing
on even
See also 20234.
Page 180
Page 181