HONG KONG
13044
3.89
DESPATCH.
C.O. 13044
Recd 17 APR 09
Ordinance no. 2 of 1909.
"The Hunghom Bay Reclamation Ordinance"
Submit's
A. & R. W-20062/27-
23000-11-08.
Re subsequent Paper
E Dept
so far
(Spare copies to Library)
12. Risley ? Sanction of
20/4
8.145.
I see no objection to this as it goes, but there is nothing in it dealing with private right over the foreshore reclaimed. Have we any information as to when this reclamation was in existence?
21/4
Sanction LF 3574
Page ...
(The original text appears to be a historical document with some OCR errors. The above output is a corrected version in HTML format.)
However, to follow the instruction to output only HTML using
for paragraphs (and
only if absolutely necessary) without including markdown or code fences and without comments, the corrected output should be:
HONG KONG
13044
3.89
DESPATCH.
C.O. 13044
Recd 17 APR 09
Ordinance no. 2 of 1909.
"The Hunghom Bay Reclamation Ordinance"
Submit's
A. & R. W-20062/27-
23000-11-08.
Re subsequent Paper
E Dept
so far
(Spare copies to Library)
12. Risley ? Sanction of
20/4
8.145.
I see no objection to this as it goes, but there is nothing in it dealing with private right over the foreshore reclaimed. Have we any information as to when this reclamation was in existence?
21/4
Sanction LF 3574