4
2008
366
no em vɗ bevant orow tasupaЯ to arostøl
.sonobnoqa8T109
ni Trisakaiq edf to mokysokiqqs e1t no,80RI ̧‚roďme?qer «NFIL
arit of bonastħba oïse vord ¡dos¤ daa urh‚♥ asɔbnail not±5A Brit
arla avom of mid gakdanupar,notns) to Laroned)-[nanoð galtsk
no bayiaa eď of Jiww to soljon art savas od startatnal todman
Hongkong, which would in due course be communicated to the
Chinese Authorities.
5.
In reply to my memorandum pointing out that
these reasons were bad in law, Mr. Fox forwarded a second letter
- 8th. October-in which the following further points were
taken.
•NOJNA” ni Jasbretab art
d.
That he could not accept my ruling that the jurisdiction
¿Todmus qe?
NJời to Testei aid at xot
M
galwollot ødt tot vlqmos Joa bivoo ed Jant betterge7,8001
-:*none8′′I
ari tuod fatontvon¶ eɗd to eqbut am yalsaqeo mid ni tærið
(osantakyat eɛenido a ddiw glistɔitto etsotuumos Jon bivos
mid nå mid of sham ad vino hivos Jasupet ødt tædd bas
„zaoxznok to tortavoð end dywords æðiɔsqaɔ raluanos
sakoteza don bluoo groxgnok to Jivod ermnqu? eild Jard
@nilsond¿dnahnstək alɗt traiøge saso side ni noltokbal¬ut
at Jostdua dalakra a vď oban idoh s tot aaw miało srit
nilt as bra jantɗo nk doetdua saanid) a danlega gnodynol
ad of tifquo eft vnofnð erit mort bebrosada don had Jnaänsteb
Lortza arld stotad Imrannd-ataIvanoð mið dyitorit bevM
of the Court extended to Chinese subjects in China, as the
Hongkong Code of Civil Procedure could not be made applio-
-able to them, and there was no treaty sanctioning it:
that in virtue of ■. II of the Chefoo Convention the
Chinese Authorities might require all cases in which
Chinese are defendants to be tried in a Chinese Court by
a Chinese Official.
That it would not be wise to attempt to enforce the
Chinese Authorities in Canton to recognise writs or
judgments of the Hongkong Court, as they would insist on re-hearing the case, and also require reciprocity.
That in referring to the reliance on the 'good offices'
of the Consul for serving a writ in Canton I had over- »looked the fact that the Order in Council only applies to
aldiskw rodɗab gatbroosda na otov tmebnotob sit tavowod I *barwoo Isumu” mife „ulajuelt to včasnt ads to ES #ISISTA
at Jiustab ed #nembut, a gatataddo to bowolfot ed blvoɗa
«BROĹZNOH
મ
British subjects.
That the practice of Hongkong Solicitors themselves serving
writs on Chinese in Canton was "an extremely irregular and
reprehensible proceeding”.
1.