t
*
2
YT
364
,aradisɗü
(gnodynol (#woð amerqu?
•
R0R1 „Morall #301
SAOCI
TwoX sgbalwondom of ruonod end evadí I
a to amigoo gatnʊlsas „Instant „bië 20 Tajjal a'zoneIlsoxi
Kotw enkast ja sedalnik datðini ada yonalInoxà BÌH Mort dosaquel
IstmoI00 bna ngloro¶ sɗt naswzeď badoatts gonsbnoqastroo
-Luanod gai‡nå at v₫ nadat moltom arið oð svitala“ nes/210
borral trauped to arettel Atiw noixennos ni nodusɔ da latene?)»
Ja Lia ora ow daɗd yAR OF TYTÖ8 ma I „druoð #kde mort mid of
nedw da betahnow ad of son aqadraq ai di as @@@OQIUQ-BROTO
arubedorg to eiur Isolafos? ylili ziev a gateauoalb ota meerça İ
Yoneliangi uo? od bartuono avad vidinnoq ya DI ,atquod sit to
dozaqeeb a'nabrol adol zin ta/t sonsbnoqastroɔ aut antaʊraq no
Tejjel 'audorána **M siekw broqɛarroo don meob visindet „didSI To
ail vď* abrow and (moitt0 nglero¶ aid of Trauna). „ded to
"atkww ynoxynok to solvea" tadta "anlıɔ ni aðruroɔ m'yjaajal
Jasel ta - Jnew nɔlineznos ■*xo% „24 «A «b#33imo zaled
#raddam duq of viazanoon at 31 alɗð broyeď rat qilantykTO
bistoria I Jadý Isitnaane at 32 on gatob al
erit aawaalb os gaisnsanos ni .taloq eno no tienvm braugotas
matter, I did so because in one aspect of it, - the issue of
Letters of Request
- I considered it so far as I was concerned
as ministerial. I was under the impression that the question
would be referred by the Minister to Shanghai. As the question
involved was whether the Consuls would execute Letters of
Request issued by this Court, I should naturally not issue them
if the Judge at Shanghai was of opinion that they ought not to
be executed. It seemed to me that I could with propriety
discuss such a question with the Judge of Shanghai. But it is
rather different now the question has been referred home. A
question of construction of Article 29 of the Order in Council
is involved; I may have to determine it when the application for Letters of Request is made to me: the Judge of Shanghai may
have to determine it should the parties to the suit move him for
a mandamus in the event of the Consul refusing to sot,; and an
appeal might lie to the Privy Council. In deciding such
questions neither the Foreign Office nor the Colonial Office
can intervene by directions, or ethertise,
This much said,
have no objestion to
assisting in putting the question, in so far as it relates to
the practice of the two Courts, on a proper footing, because
it is one in which litigants before my Court are interested; and with this object in view I shall briefly analyse the
correspondence,
?