Divans would not be allowed to exist general.
The question of policy after the report after March 1910 to be considered after Shanghai Commission.
The Commission has it is clear will Na has reported that, but I March, that it's resolutions not give much practical and.
Therefore, though the {ou? is going separately (see Arter fabrication & the Demanden.
You wenty stated it seems to have ben Jaklished. Dat bo brave & sof 325 (a). Tha communicatin 76 The F.O Sin F. Lugard's б Na Vieir proper policy for China to adopt.
to ad dzers The Secretary of Stata об ad which The next opcion farm respatch of 187. (12887) well to March : para 4.) it would be telegraph hom at nie.
End to them if H.M.G. have it in mind to adopt the folicy of not allowing any in Hong Kong.
On the other further opin farms hand, if it is intended to follow the suggestion (outlined in Z 43606/08 and refered to That the for para 20 in para 2 (as fondest of Jan 8+ 1909 should cation be quite sufferent (43471))! Then it will Eos is detailed proposals, to wait for the cou.
Apart from Course tance A Приё matter 8 do Hong Kong qastiois · Subsidiary trans despatch. which is of foo but be lim * a progre I don't think there calculated to But (1) it is, of course, suggest comm recommendation it recommends Hang trong 1 and 1 محرم anything in it give Spence.
useless to Chann This 8 The system which is to be abolished in (2) The creation of monopolist for the whole hardly practicable suggested but this is mainly The reputation 1 administrata. heeised China the bebola (witness £55,000,000) matter affecting a4 revenue 8 a Si F. Lugard is reference to The idea (b). Six F Lugard he "pposed" the policy of H.M.G.
Rat It is sifficult to much say in reply his - because, The frist mifer- a out 9 Detra as my amant Jium to this point Па puvate telegram of Dec 12 =, tha Secretary of State said suggestion of hat the Sin F. Lagend one arise