COS
266
ntativo ditiw notxe 609
.IBYOTANG v not segnano boao7074
Excellency's letter of 16th March, after consulting with
antuse ,tisqaab ni em of one o
espnatu matbroqci ment
the Registrar as Head of Department. The effect of this
bis viaronoak Istmofob eris daiw geiston ob blwon eri taria
番
hellazne veng na “istru vany ATOV MÍAnoqo`q add Jand
T bortdrevo vbastris nav a bus,etku no XTOW BIJES
(ffaroezes que redom: mis olas humorɑ I vale nisl be motel
athujerg "tov asw di sÓSunns HAW em hlot har of sew ti as
eft tot noprettet: I Crazzismert, add to Stov sift or Ia-
1 Hobiw to fijannate i
was obviously to sever the Registry completely from the
Judges, and leave the advice tendered to the Governor in
respect of contemplated changes entirely in the hands of
the Colonial Secretary. My opinion then was
女
and is now,
for reasons given in my letters, that nothing could be
more prejudicial to the efficient work of the Registry. In
view of Your Excellency's subsequent action in connexion
with recent appointrmets to the registry, it is unnecessary
t
gindee .dees to *o*dol
[[wv. e*lup verof deat
nožýmazta Larosqe vach or
"ON
asy I možtos oft
to refer at length to this question as it has now been
wo neswred herans (9.2
sonsbroqea**o*
EU.S. 2
to moisa! ede dobɗw ni tloag: bus vous{faoxf
AOIJPĒM 8:2 Ra low as beesirundh saw tatrabet e
Bяw zł že 3 bonbasatan I
t
.JES KITOYOð sle of maghut wild to
hazal preccoo or brage* data modië &Ivanoo os Isirnasse
eut y be rotet nd ·Imo biror» zud ,ad Jon bliroria verit
cris had vera reits legemanaged 20 basf!
200 20 Tsarei aft [[sox* quo\" to & digarDA' BQ NI .abam
(ezna: 278qo (Ia nì seravio to viliouoq es era foral
Latrolo ela nabw JHAY of hire new
vijaiņa, mle galbeforİ
Tuoy to diɖetngis, dark are mort
erbaas
I
VIAJATOAR
settled in a way which is entirely satisfactory to myself,
and will, if future Governors and Chief Justices work
harmoniously on the lines indicated in the correspondence,
do much to promote the efficiency of the Registry which
stands in much need of improvement. I beg leave to refer
to my letter of 4th December, 1908, in this connexion.
9.
The point however on which I desire now to
insist is that when Your Fxcellency says (paragraph 2)
that "the issue was complicated by an instruction" which I
issued to Mr. Seth, it is, with deference, hardly an
accurate representation of ry action. Whether Mr. Seth had
interviews with the Colonial Secretary subsequently to
22
those