Lis
242
servol vg, to a ddarparaq ni oz bobuffa Jusblout sc. o* sonerate“
vibonɛA Gvitalnized on
tele meg of extror I (
wa antadeh to safin edr or 5lay at fuamara dobiV Sİ
fow donen add ng with vagamiTON
@aniq 100* ae kožamuoeib a
4 vd abum Ianoqona a no
zend spala anotɛan00 itoon 9yar ered? do:ld van O.
7 Haliw NO * Finmco0 x maribeeoong to alalgros of bat ere
telao mu to nol thaoy arè kot bosnan 19qoruq dobim
orget I .50-
wore med tor
eds to gobonuses Kalonza
wath wort ]
STAT
to
-~© et rabaa buds I too and to enota summ grit ek gemme
rolens eitt hegr
an of be a fobie sonde temasky a pocos
tnerunsvo" ale of awon to s£u. odt bezwolamazoo bna,dent I
TAJTEN AJ to motulgo on mulvad vitneta [08 Jus stovo))
on berkenan
.90*9.. 30 to new be mild og nolzge,p art bermagan
irtavon add mo“? mokėmoltum:oo
ksa nd qe nadst
4 to re
nie w olduq shs, raw Kadets 2
J PRBO * to druck son att ni xistro aen Poies
-nexa na bentatron *} mugrh vlezaruopani hua virago" put asu ¡noiasetony ode to surete, a suft to Jamesosta aurticu hra bedarem
wong me to acloa qu baxwide viieqorqmi dao
to warmtevfo
R
o M:
nis teultant at Da ¿ta is a noise:1-
,naišlėougo tie:ld warbiziw (erub had varie ceh.
texians ð hand
tebralac® ali ni betalatey Tedrado a
and 24 dan atm (altrem, don arow Yait au tat de of
nolens tres gadie needs to arija zb rey TAVR sứt ni Jand i hat I twit cost rede tut d to exign at hae,etos? awor - Praz (ADNAIAÑA oral taleem af de
卢
nisddo od 19010 ti neyo bind new visində” ibass no
fielu sm of 208 KAW TAZAL zerbaitot 8 has,todriado ode to zasty
thennain bal esomeprosto oIody wit Bauonėna
C
-mtovor adr most berkenan 7 noj (godits-on dina e't sav aldi bas [foto bmiz sozły zanbt adé ich bude 3 toolding only no daga
Tesou
courtesy to the Chief Justice required that the arguments used
by the members of profession should have been submitted to him
for his opinion before the Government acquiesced in them.
I have been compelled in connexion with the
views expressed by His Excellency in connexion with the position
of the Registrar of the Court, to protest against the omission
to refer to me the statements of the Registrar before His
Excellency formed an opinion on it. I pointed out in paragraph
12 of my letter of 13th February, that putting the question of
official courtesy to the Chief Justice on one side, the right
of reply is one of the commonest incidents to the statement of
a case,
and until there has been a reply the question is not
ripe for decision. This is all the more important when the
question is one with which the person who has to decide is not
familiar, and the person who has raised the question is perfectly
familiar. The same thing has happened here; but it is a
stronger case, for the question in all its hearings had never
been submitted to the Government, nor had His Excellency ever
asked for any information on the subject: and here again the
question was one of detail with which His Excellency was
unfamiliar, and with which the Chief Justice was perfectly
familiar. Even this does not exhaust the objections which I am
compelled to raise to His Excellency's action. He adopted not
only the statements made by the Chairman of the Chamber, in
spite of the admitted inaccuracy of the statement as to their
origin, but he also adopted the statements made by some of the
Solicitors of my Court, many of them very junior men, thereby
taking their side in a controversy of which I knew nothing, and
to which I was not a party; and they were adopted not only
without submitting the arguments for my opinion, but without
answering my letter. If the members of the profession had
desired to continue their opposition the Governor of the
Colony would have taken part with them against the Chief Justice without knowing the whole case. As a fact they had withdrawn their opposition, so that the Governor of the Colony
WES