217

Casto

be used undeclared by are aney filone

сам

of

conviction of a plone or any offrince

order to br

C

misdemrave

or misdemeanour with which

it

Mand

A

Magistrati

deal summarily, the crimes in Schod 3 of the Principal orta brinę rated out as

Sofas, transon, § 5 provides for

K 7745

of

this punishment.'

x

heretofore.

X

increase in

in the case

It was, however, alleged by Mr Ho Kai [Debate §.156] that the stocks you!? under this section be extended

Cine

A-G's refle

previous carry

Liability to the stocks. on this point is not

thru au

very

to certain statuting misdemeanours which did not

The clear / Rebates p. 158] but he appears to have laid downs that

only 300 14 offences of this kind on the H. Kong statist book and he maintained that some

of than would I suitate "sulpdio for stocks"- Eventually, however, he met Mr Ho Kai's

objection by expressly excepting from the

Stocks the offences under the 4 ordes set out in the schedule to the ordre, and Mr Ho Kai

accepted the amendment.

If sams clear, therefore, that the interstion was

maintain the state. Cuo

to stocks

minati subject to the possibility, refined to in

Marty

that some

misdemeanour which she hour brea included in the axempotions may have been

amitted

I think that use 5 quis affict !ŏ that intention with regard to all existing,

thu

offences wi H. Kone - is at the dati of

Enactment of this order

But sse 5 appears to me

to make it possible to

increase the use of the stretes in the future, for

ifa

new meedeimant's is created by a pature We which composers magistrates to deal with

unless that orde

it summarily, then

offences - vide

to tas

Excludes the stocks, the magistrati with to ath to seating the offender to that punishment under Sex 5

of the present order. There would be

211

Debaba p.170.

ac

increase

at all wints in the number if not in the kinds

of offences punishath by stocks.

J.JA. Hs

Presumably the H. Khong authorities wont refiles that an increase of this kind was not prohibited but was

usceroainly contemplated by order 13 of 1907, and that

to stocks is therefore

the status quo

maintained)

Lord Crewe.

MW: Thisley has been good enough to discurs this fully with me this morning.

Section 4 of the Ordinance, amending

Of the 1

sfject.

sec: 86

o Ordinance will not do. The

1890

as stated

by

The Attorney General is

in the case of

to substitute whipping for all offences for

any

other furnishment; but the affect might be to authorize whishing in addition to other pumistimment.

J

suggest there fore that we should with holl sanction pending,

amendment Leasing

out the works

ddition to and addi

Share This Page