808
2202 74. a time to note zu
SA OPII at erreAS
la ro? DU
A
A
BB SLA
03
*
#knes, elbarng Saoude
wie to be a'n. modDBIR {
JI
nute to dean Isirane
dadd
10
.. bred To
*i der os bry ANO
te nattqobe rea Peru S.
aatadeerah to edle
Awon Boris AT
mele 8A 300 be-
manovo Iver A **kw & prisilað
ba qudells? Kttw
*
od gave hiras
non habloony tł god.
206
Steamers loading and discharging &c. even if the deep
-33a wall was continued as at first planned at a cost of
$751,000. The passenger Station would be awkwardly
situated and as the Director of Public Works' figures shew,
the real cost would be greater to Government since more
valuable Crown Land would be occupied than under the pro-
posed scheme.
The existing Railway Estimates do not
provide for either the cost of land resumption for the
station, or for the Station Buildings. As it had hitherto
been assured that a permanent and expensive Station would
be built instead of a temporary one as now proposed, the
cost involved by the present proposals are actually less
than might have been anticipated under any other scheme. If
the cost of Crown Land bo included the schemes are
estimated by the Director of Public Works as follows:-
$811,750
Scheme 1...
Scheme 2... .$1,078,243
Scheme 3... .$1,177.363
Page 808
...
TIES AN f
tal ov hrbo a'bmast
and eldkælvhanh 22 (1 can (on)
BRI QAF0-
CRIA
oilte. ebon to notanetxe en
A
67
30 10 Yew epic net ne horow &*One? *
...
Page 808