at ou ta't evue etate to une J97DER 5.
145
in my opinion, subject to the legal duty of complying with the
Bonsaibro ode to ros;do niwa erit og brano* malvs.
Jaf bogi"ba"
50 of blei ad con bloo -- .* Tehnu mo?
xs to rawol ATE
70 so I sognetsh i
J
"yarb Janef to baix
Natw holyos
to dezont szív od naviy meri as
My nb puastupos
enotato b
“O RALNOG stol s tl mah bial road nad dohíw eiqiUMINU
0.
DS #
isobotnath s
# al motta1062k all to Palotaxe eris、US-
A 20% Dg pidenour a mi ti malo-axe of VAND
* belidant of víno ngo nedar nultos 5:12 28'? bra ¡ronne.
Norẫy sa nao koltemal jõe előrHORSE“
ps of nevin reul mar Holw solvha o`t die
conditions under which that section was introduced. The exer-
cise of the discretion in the case of Mr. Ho Tung does, in the
opinion of Dr. Ho Kai, one of the Chinese residents and a
member of Council, who withdrew his opposition to the Ordinance
on condition that the exemption clause should be introduced,
infringe those conditions. The subsequent opinion of Dr. Ho Kai
which was given to the Colonial Secretary, having been given
under a misapprehension of the actual facts of Mr. Ho Tung's
proposed tenancy of my house, is, as I have already stated, now
withdrawn; and he maintains the view originally expressed to me,
that the refusal to grant the exemption to Mr. Ho Tung in the
circumstances was in violation of the agreement come to with the
# T
nutzen ablu on piedrogi sta æti.
i. #osido rtem sili varit twon-[[ew vfrostnej
to rolinxo Az pron xa, benihontal Jer}'t aøw ennanib~O
Chinese residents.
5.
The Secretary of State further says that he
SAAB "no ground for the contention that the Government in
bannbrada ef of het alia sælt hus
dsel aut mont
Council did not exercise a reasonable and proper discretion
Iro me h
netreroath ext to Balotexe
A
new root drogong at) at womankhÒ
,beauthorsal wil broda „b la dant
Jon ba、..a to dosjša miøs ellt of heraton of stuterija Join
under s. 4. of the Ordinance". "ith much regret I cannot
acquiesce in that view for the following reasons:-
Some of the Members of the Executive
Council were in favour of the exemption being granted. Others
vild bhe ¡9unciibro or to tosiɗo ntan end of
opposed it on the ground that the Furie was so close to Mountain
,nå Ikawrot ortrime. at zavarevo? ede ut botuer nolteroalb 11t
Lodge that no Chinese should be allowed to rent it: (see His Excellency's
It appears that the original text is heavily corrupted due to OCR errors. I will correct the text to the best of my abilities while following the given rules. Here is the corrected text in HTML format:Page 145
In my opinion, subject to the legal duty of complying with the
conditions under which that section was introduced. The exercise of the discretion in the case of Mr. Ho Tung does, in the
opinion of Dr. Ho Kai, one of the Chinese residents and a
member of Council, who withdrew his opposition to the Ordinance
on condition that the exemption clause should be introduced,
infringe those conditions. The subsequent opinion of Dr. Ho Kai
which was given to the Colonial Secretary, having been given
under a misapprehension of the actual facts of Mr. Ho Tung's
proposed tenancy of my house, is, as I have already stated, now
withdrawn; and he maintains the view originally expressed to me,
that the refusal to grant the exemption to Mr. Ho Tung in the
circumstances was in violation of the agreement come to with the
Chinese residents.
5.
The Secretary of State further says that he
sees "no ground for the contention that the Government in
Council did not exercise a reasonable and proper discretion
under s. 4. of the Ordinance". With much regret I cannot
acquiesce in that view for the following reasons:-
Some of the Members of the Executive
Council were in favour of the exemption being granted. Others
opposed it on the ground that the Furie was so close to Mountain
Lodge that no Chinese should be allowed to rent it: (see His Excellency's
Let me know if you need further assistance!