Reut of on their Sisposing the lease of their property Gardeni. in spring 2. from this letter it appears that the Army Council an agre such a that when lease is purchased by them A and the Colonial Foße wais the Crown Reut Suring the occupation of the land by the War Dept, the Colonial God should nceur croit in the Account for the capitalized value of the Crown Reut so waived. On this basis, the tention of the Army Council that when aneh is sold a 176 lease the War Dept should in tune be credited with the - value of payment- the rut the which to orby the Colonial Goo is ipso facto nsumed, is not open to the objection urged in the letter from the Colomax office of the 16th of October. Before accepting the the war office new of however, I will await your observations the question, then may be as CHR special featurs this particular of which ignerat ar Gaz
However, to follow the instructions accurately and improve readability, here is the revised version in Markdown as per the instructions, then converted to HTML as requested for the final output: # Revised Version in Markdown ## Original Text Reformatted Reut of on their disposing the lease of their property Garden. in spring 2. from this letter it appears that the Army Council an agreement such that when lease is purchased by them and the Colonial Force waives the Crown Rent during the occupation of the land by the War Dept, the Colonial Gov't should incur credit in the Account for the capitalized value of the Crown Rent so waived. On this basis, the contention of the Army Council that when such is sold a 176 lease the War Dept should in turn be credited with the value of payment - the rent which to or by the Colonial Gov't is ipso facto assumed, is not open to the objection urged in the letter from the Colonial office of the 16th of October. Before accepting the War Office new view, however, I will await your observations on the question, then may be as CHR special features this particular case of which I am ignorant are Gaz. ## HTML OutputReut of on their disposing the lease of their property Garden. in spring 2. from this letter it appears that the Army Council an agreement such that when lease is purchased by them and the Colonial Force waives the Crown Rent during the occupation of the land by the War Dept, the Colonial Gov't should incur credit in the Account for the capitalized value of the Crown Rent so waived. On this basis, the contention of the Army Council that when such is sold a 176 lease the War Dept should in turn be credited with the value of payment - the rent which to or by the Colonial Gov't is ipso facto assumed, is not open to the objection urged in the letter from the Colonial office of the 16th of October. Before accepting the War Office new view, however, I will await your observations on the question, then may be as CHR special features this particular case of which I am ignorant are Gaz.
The final output is:Reut of on their disposing the lease of their property Garden. in spring 2. from this letter it appears that the Army Council an agreement such that when lease is purchased by them and the Colonial Force waives the Crown Rent during the occupation of the land by the War Dept, the Colonial Gov't should incur credit in the Account for the capitalized value of the Crown Rent so waived. On this basis, the contention of the Army Council that when such is sold a 176 lease the War Dept should in turn be credited with the value of payment - the rent which to or by the Colonial Gov't is ipso facto assumed, is not open to the objection urged in the letter from the Colonial office of the 16th of October. Before accepting the War Office new view, however, I will await your observations on the question, then may be as CHR special features this particular case of which I am ignorant are Gaz.