1943
$
„ČUTIMIN MOITASC9900 SEHNTED OMA HAITIRS AHT
202HOIMIHAI HOGUEOGASS
་
.8091,Hans forsla
辈
.yowlish nooiwoƐ antas?
dmade * bra to #glener erit egbe Iwondos af god ew
mt biay
. If dnotami deel met to reddel runy not woy
to taleber vrid eghelwordos of as boon 08 Sms woy doliw
- Ib y au protri ot öns tпkdent ndë ent to reddy! TND
metrel mun to woo a dard yeno brewbl 13 to пoidost
ow andleg de reteicill a'ytan tall at nt duse need ser
aqeta doje edat of bedesuper need emit elsa sit de ægri
oumstanno unit mi yelsh tubnu blova od dil dmirit you or as
.enil bad to mold
-ob 10 sonabiya oft tand Jun dring nd studNSV 6W
to nels at Ticwid Aud maideeup & Torfw eds Jon at yol
abstedw sali eeslo Jarit s es beqglupe brs betouidenno
-Ibreqxe Myob two od tuovasbne Itw basnim eft *se) ow
.la
(data lo visJetos? TebrÜ
.601110 пgieTO”
expenditure at the cost of the efficiency of their line.
This is of course a matter of grave concern to the
Government of Hongkong and we may remark that with a
view to securing uniformity in character of construc-
tion and equipment His Majesty's Colonial Office have
been and are desirous that the same Consulting Engin-
eers should be appointed for both the Colonial and
Chinese Sections of the Railway.
Sir John Wolfe Barry is we understand Consulting
Engineer for the Hongkong Government Railway and if as
we anticipated he and Mr. A. J. Barry who reported on
the Chinese Section had been appointed by the Chinese
to act for them the arrangement desired by the Colon-
ial Office and by ourselves would have been accomplished
Although our responsibilities in connection with
construction are limited, we nevertheless feel a moral
responsibility as Trustees for the Bondholders to do
the best we can for what is to be their security as
well as for Chinese Railway enterprise in which we are
so deeply interested and we beg leave to reiterate the
opinion expressed in our former letter that if as they
propose