occatimal
for cowemence of reference
In time it
The Frentan
or quali bai Cont line
Mr Faddes
will requie a clinical staff to look after
!
then
has a
uando
Moreover
milk. the Leutana
mly
of there, there
five hoop room.
be kept on the chance of the (Coltecretary) permanent staff. Jamalso quite sure that the small denial call of the Secretariat has
Enough le do without adding the labour of duplicating a lot of desht
I which
we donot want.
fter tiffer
5 think wi
& duplicate LFs.
kas
23/an
sho simply refuse
subregistły
I work to do.
quite enough
Reply that the
sgs.
regrets that song to the amount. of additimal labour involved it will
h
3-0
impossible to comply with his request
it relatin
prinker founs
atten
spins all type written will be sent.
of
I and also take the
arking why it
Keep
a
duplicate set of despatches
the dupli
telephonic
WD n
23
ags entirely
with the
vieirs
444
sxpressed
proper place
in the foregoing minutes as to the of deposit for records. You will remember that
the subject
was discussed at the CR Revisione
Committee, who
1
were unanimous that despatches
should not inly be recorded, but foit dealt with, in the Secretariat and drafted a regulation to that effect, which was
havever dropped
ground that CR 175 would probably enfficient.
Gen
the
With
regard to duplicite ;
; we should
not refuse type-witter
copies;
but
duplication of LF's defeat their object. We do not keep copies
ourselves and the extra labour involved in
making them would be considenble. Perhaps, if
the
A
could
Govermer
were
b
press, we
duplicate blank hat in each br filled up canly
the necessity.
I do not see
hor I.
in the
oft alone
offertuml; considered neessay
Spen
2572
Parte
Etwas
Pr. 26
Mr Fiddes
Sunetemper tal pliva)
Mor Green you may wish to comment on
1390–A. & E. W.-20024/26—5,000—11-08.
night send him
which
Cate
Coluny
"
J. Me
Q.27)
Remind! mm 29/1 Dr. 2
but
Page 450Page 451