& outнolont
YC00
(2)
345
ano!content s'one Isox & to consvettig I
IoD
.no!!
to rettel · rit no anoktaviando amoe #trdum að *llustsosqre" 30d I
,tnateni davi eda to soltau takdo add "Hono" al
edy of miseqqa *editedw at asalta moldesup Ja*it eft
[
„vimo mokothatur, femi¬t¬0 ed? mort all of 978 trucð LaequA we?
ode won [[@ gaidatze erit dara soltert, telmo nit Hilw semme T
I bna notaalbatros vATU? M 17 kineqgs not bentarer ad bluoda
,antartalmat to anotaloob mort ħha hiu w
bra ji vladambti ed od riseqys at erettem motusofzetak of så
arodnarth ni eotdat teiro sift mort aiseqqa bra dan wat sy d
yam alanque dona roddow at bantosh aď of Anids I moltasup ste
ne datw ennstaal tent” edit at wo or ¬nitalza 67 or alr
-ga dora todże w to Juoo we add of Issq'a to zriniz etanidir
wa" nilt of si! «nológeoxe -Idinɛoq elatrao dêłw blode alsoq
adt Id Labad erið at baviował aurio valah art «Joerih dual
zetten e vibot wobnu al atetor soljant teid ont folds of noitos
€
YAM 80(671aqri Jnito.wraq to anoljasup auf nottansblanoɔ yot
89685 nl exodimio ni soldat teto ode dort alsaqqs no salts
-1?i£ s oviuqob or Xatrið I bns not tolbethub Lamiętro sit nidely
binow 29880 dove në duob wel art of Iæ:198 to Jimin mid to 2087
.wały mi dontɗo add taotab etwasem a ni
RAST to woat al bsgw virist ed vær notniqo va ni Insh boom A oð notĉotbalul staffeyqA #Lon and eldṭanoq as yet ce nature the on
bay hobulis evad 7 Notriw of emetom ode mnibufoxe mod wolf wild
Jna ungra toiro er
.878JJAM *oduoo[rezni aistreɔ vidie801
odt galub ertit eldalhava ed ton IIw aradt fedt at di tanúi ans
salt to traurie add tuď søranansa ob .H in to sety Isunne-id
drow dual sɗd to notteagnoo add as net oɛ ni Ilave don binow II quidaixe eft vɗ baiquoso art aris sawaɔed bentangoo ai exer
*80*oquɣ *edito xot aidallow ad blow eleqje ?ntraedal dr:0
To deal however with the specific point raised in paragraph 1
of his letter I may point out that although I understand as a
fact the Chief Justice hears all cases in Original Jurisdiction
he has the right to regulate the distribution of business in the
Court and there is nothing to prevent the Puiane Judge trying a
case in the Original Jurisdiction and with great deference I
fail to see any practical difference between the vote of the
"imported Judge" and a third Judge resident in the Colony, or
how the possible distribution of the work of the Original Juris-
diction between the Chief Justice and a Senior Puisne Judge af-
fects the question, the point being that whether the appeal lies
from either Judge there will a third Judge who will together
with one other of the Judges be able to bring a judgment to bear
unfettered by any idea of the case conceived in the court below.
2. (a) I have submitted observations on this in the last pre-
ceding paragraph.
(b) As to the delay in appeals from cases heard "during the
first half of the six monthly period" I scarcely think a suitor
would have much cause of complaint particularly having regard
to the infinitely larger period of delay usually existing at
home.
The Chief Justice assumes that two months, presumably one in the
Spring and one in the Autumn, will be alloted for appeals to
the New Court which he contends is insufficient and in this he
excludes for reasons stated two days weekly (Friday and Saturday)
from the reckoning.
I cannot of course criticise the views of
His Honour based on the knowledge of the workings of his own
Court but I presume he would so arrange the work as to make as
far as possible the two months available for the appeals to the
New Court and counsel and solicitors being aware of the regular
period fixed would have to arrange their cases accordingly, and
here suitors are resident on the spot and have no distance to
travel.