82%
340
CH
r
.8001,radmavolt.dat$
➡ngvo% .bas to rastel a'vonn(Crox wo¥ nI
1
180-
besolone at 19:301 8 (bagbalvorom vhaaris evert I daliw and dvdrw ni,tadmarqaë .281 bu‡nh stað? to vratotoe? arid mort need asd aamo on dara motaigo and baazarqxo sist? to Vajato07 akɗt dads wana I .embut, saatı¶ buones a guituloqqa no? đưo nhse arið dqsoos of aenlionh 9182” to vratamoe? and Jadd mser don aeob to drow ont ob of warf er talic Bottant sto odt to enJ R38 renoidiJoang yna dolɗw,tost to Jnerejeja a al sad? .ee but out Vi88e9osa dinunde asw 31 11 husgoð viððnað hinoo troð sdt el are aterit soltaut teldo eft to tomadsta nit vtitev os .oa oh bluos ofw nohaol at won two edt al arenottheoeng ¿daimurA „tė 82 to 19.2si e'zoneffanxя two¥ mI
.S
10% .пOBAT OT 8888 stat? to VIAJOZ09? edt tædt am Total Hot #stom wit ni texnam lanoliqeoxe na ni soltert teich suð guldsent atrie nt moltnoll (qa 17 JANS Jerger doum I SVAAI Holtrosv to 10- tatɗo edo deft uaw I hootersbruratmı need evať od arteea retārm -noijqsoxs na ni bersert od regnol on bluoda gnodyno) to soltant bluoriæ ad teft tud 、eveal noidnomy to ta‡jem odt at Tennse la- I .eript add to atraj tadto ni aaghuh, marito ora sa bejsett ed wilt doldw ni ynolod on al szedt tærð gntyee mi digit me I Amidt fruta oe el trob emorquë edt to aegbut edt to eveal noijanaT valzusoen art eredw vaolo) on al erad? .ynodynok mi ali ti aa etom at Terowa sild to dasd gated eft tefta avsel noltaɔav tot
to arstant writ Hotriw od are33»I va dood al
•VIAC899en
of herretex I arowana s'a of hemolanen "vode vone[[eox uo asidom
Tables of Statistics which showed the actual Court work done by the Chief Justice during certain periods in preceding years. They are not alluded to in the answers of the Secretary of State. I much regret to find that they have not conveyed to the Secretary of State the information they were intended to convey, namely, that a very large increase of work has fallen on the Chief Justice during the last three years and a half.
4.
In my letter of 10th. November, dealing
with the constitution of the proposed new Court, dealin of Appeal, I gave a short table of heavy cases tried by me during the weeks immediately preceding the last Long Vacation. I may usefully repeat the table as it will serve to re-inforce the statements I have already made with regard to the Chief Justice's work; it is by no means exceptional, and it does not of course represent the whole of the work which had to be got through. Any one conversant with judicial work will be able to appreciate the time required to prepare the judgments in lengthy cases of this nature, full as they were of complicated details
and accounts.
On June 29th., I began a case which lasted 11 days, and the appeal to the Pull Court, which began on August
31st., lasted 51 days:
3 days.
On July 29th., I began a case which lasted
On August 4th., one which lasted 74 days. On August 18th., one which lasted 6 days. On August 27th., one which lasted 2 days: and On September 9th., one which lasted 8 days.
If Your Excellency had done me the honour of
consulting me as Chief Justice with regard to the business of the Court before making your recent statement in Council, should have informed Your Excellency that at that time and for
and some time previously the pressure was and had been extreme,
5.
I
that