Y 500
334
ZEI,Tadrov9.st÷0£,"noxanok
ox to dqarneraq bnoosa sið oð viqer mi
#redded to selgon dahiw al 、Tednavo” .bas to rettel &'yonslingx7
vojetos? erit bra,eaminofol art not misą? to vredanos? edd non?
-ong and nictw szliseb beaofom ara anlattA mienok "o" etat? to
Ineq A ert to “edrtui a ed bimode setareus2 ab A 712 A 880G
-10% odd atridue co wort ers evad won! .vrolol end to crued
anotte AV All of nego at (ɛɛO4ODI SAT
9:13 mort all Isaqus ne sodom vilanitosną di tadz nottosido
nofob and að misnot smbil a od whofon add to solter tako
Candybr0 mort sleeqqs tut Pehnsant vino et deuɔ0 Irep won aam
bread -78 nottolbatur, Lenigtað at seano ['s bus molanibeliuk
C
Anoted
mobalyo to nonetettth to aas: nb ¡eoltaut Tel:0 P
auto at etor mustdemo 9.3 enjut ecelit erið fra "Iennki roov dnd
(agbul, betrol and od soltaus, TALI” And wort hornetenend an of
p'taur sd of 978 bi w beaso Ile ci rotidra ar mht eadem dal v
-89up on?
«VIBRAADSi el “ethɗta na ateriw deuon war eff* s*ated
rwens blow 31 / Lưw te ́d most Juo^e^?ib, «zing crot a 24/int molt
-0% Cani ntxo art sada 10% ,Ynolol and nt zembut, & exew azert ti
sottant told) ait eowted betudindelb od binow how nofżołbal*
.eabi anein¶ sobie? ef k s
-noo to Isah Jasty a oaraɔ I{bw anaing art
•sfdsoktoenged ed of swong [Itw notulgo vr al bna nolaut
Jon berlater ed tour to Ilı qattalxe edit
(a)
zhani tot oala dud jaoltothébut, SETUP MOrt »[seqqa No7 VI: “AN
.3
wall end vd brand viazanit In ad od zlaoqqa ni aradise vroðunef-
-ga yot bagi atst að hluose at tað oɛla IalocereÐ 8! +T
.*7:00
nego IItw di salwmerito ¡aredmer) al soltest Tel:0 erit mont alaal
aid not adnaegbul vrarë mort abam guled alsaqqa of yaw are
the sake of obtaining delay, which would be highly detrimental to the commercial community. It must also be retained in all appeals from Chambers, for otherwise appeals will be lodged in interlocutory matters, which will lead to hanging up the actions
in which they are made indefinitely.
(b)
On the assumption that the Judge of Shan-
-ghai comes to the Colony once every six months, there will be unnecessary delay in appeals from cases heard during the first half of the six-monthly period. But it is also assumed
that one month in six will be sufficient. I am not aware on
what faces this calculation has been based, nor cen I say
whether it will be sufficient. I have no doubt that appeals will increase in number, and I do not know what provisions it is contemplated to make if the month is insufficient for hear- -ing all the appeals which are set down. The month will not provide more than 12 working days, which will allow for 3 or
perhaps 4 appeals, but not more.
question:-
The following statistics bear upon this
On June 29th., I began a case which lasted 11days; and the appeal to the Full Court, which began on August
3lat., lasted 54 days.
3 days:
On July 29th., I began a case which lasted
On August 4th., one which lasted 4 days.
On August 18th., one which lasted 6 days. On August 27th., one which lasted 2 days, and on September 9th., one which lasted 8 days.
This is by no means exceptional.
In every one of these an appeal is possible, and I understand that in the three long ones the cases have gone home for advice as to whether there should be an appeal. If the new Appeal Court had been established it is quite possible that there would have been four heavy appeals arising
out