4.
OP Y.
323
-:etorw,beɑolone woy ɑdunia dRoftw
Ge
*
.*l noisolbatuu?
to noitaeup end at egnaɗo sits to tora? ni duofumma tatɗfo act*
to atalanoo trob fasqs edt bedudidanoo dasɛang da bi .Ise qa
Caniga ada marw to ano eghut eratu¶ ert bus soldaut telño are
f? .etov gultaso sad aari mottaub teid) ede bпs,aeti vflrsaanuen
Jentsņa Isoqqa I'iw venom ent esɗ orw eno yna daɗt al divest
paltamo sdo to sonsupeenon ml) egbut enelut eɗt to notaloob and
wild to noteloeb a tanlega Laeqya Ilkw eno on deift dud (stov
vyt¬¶ exit of seað Brit VT180 or abnetni ed aseinu goldant telo
Jmenos tev s ka akit aestradosisio tomo "o"."Itomos
artle re:ido vna za to nedt redtte Jars balt connao I jud ¡dan^*
Iarnnad” to enburt, add dat Lenoqong wld or badoatdo awad wor
a) de 3 bawor sit no IseqjA to sqbul a na ere: tla biroda
arit no .teetox tankene Ins to embut, ♬ mid educiranoo bluow
310MB HOBAOT View Jarit tot nend evad of arsejqa ti vietnos
a to sneriantoqa adet batsoovba ean tuono two JB ↑ Braido
.ynofo0 ɛtdt ni oyburt Brid?
-879bian100 raier? no JaNd Stotererà tamd I
bIvorie I Jars noljemua edit wasbridiw [Ilw wrono o nols-
beɛogong ai? 28.3 doette ert or ejai” to V78/97092 edt of sidso
za oldsmottoetɗo ed molnigo e'rwonok roy ni biяow *NOMBINA"78
art mont Iseva to enbir), a Ladyus 2 to sabub edð gatavatranoo
edo eroted tad♪ adnob don oh I bas ignod"no" to eoidmul teld?
of betaulature oo ea IIIw allateb erit babilonoo ens atnoregaB778
wo motal of flat Jon Ilaña I easɔ doidw ni warto broI. vd om
瞥
sir,
Chambers,
Supreme Court, Hongkong,
23rd. September, 1908.
In reply to Your Excellency's letter of
21st. instant on the subject of the proposed appointment of the
Judge of Shanghai as a Judge of Appeal in Hongkong, which I have the honour to acknowledge, I should inform Your Excellency that
my letter of 17th. instant, was necessarily very brief, as it
would be impossible to refer to all the details of the subject
which are involved in the proposal. My letter was therefore I
fear not very clear. It is not however necessary now to go into
all those details until we see what the scheme is; and without
going into the matter at length I do not think I can have said anything which could be construed into concurring in Your Excel-
-lency's scheme. The only remark which it is necessary to make
now is that the question of bringing the Judge down from Shanghai
involves very different issues from those raised by the question
of appointing a third judge.
2.
The formation of an Appeal Court with the
assistance of the Judge of Shanghai can only be done in one of
two ways:-
**500 STA I
,brand.
.* (.ba)
..5%, kontsTON
. WONDE
soltaut toi o ant
ΥΠΟ ΠΟΥ Ε
1
(1) by making the Appeal from the Original Juris- -diction (i.e. the Chief Justice) 11e to the Judge of Shanghai and the Pulsne Judge, which was the possibil:
my
-ty I had in find, and in which case the Judge of Shanghai would become the Appellate Judge from the
Chief Justice of Hongkong.
(2) making the Court a Court of three Judges: in
which case there would be so many appeals that it
would block the ordinary work of the Court.
Or