90 Ulo 0
Lonx
ono tenerle T
1
to nobrā
10
mato In
T
*
Jebat at o
་
OV V
A. bet azt oli.
una token Cum i
to go for
* et d
HOLI BOAT
Q
towe Go Imuda roi gow out Jal
bot
3 9VS. od vrient anodotIon
bronce wa
"on ledbes
par le does hfnow was ant to rotate
bio tu
A.i
10 0. beat om.
ou no dusmorzanih au to waly #tastalebeant et nd 10 taut
,notuceto., mult
etledar Naltri e duetroqiri
tortau sud ni b coord of of anione ng baruw od Nnhalt von ob I
.0
#boine of antesh von I dobiw not took
„for png mrokef ated to wurdehoch mild to nobean bi 800 mdd
nd ev orlw
ť
T nokrat bl
६
oo wont hadtt e vin totivo daivoa freed
'so of
mi moatte oyat dolu anothergil
tufe dotar ull to *ndhedo n no moltiA dá deka noiz, unoo
Now Ilank Montevon
437
matter I have already intimated to Your Excellency in my letter of 6th. March last, that I hold the strongest possible view with regard to that action. But I an unwilling to revive the controversy, or to trouble Your Excelleney with a long letter which may after all not ne necessary. I trust therefore that Your Excellency will forward the request contained in the following paragraphs of this letter to the Secretary of State without reference to the correspondence with the Chariber of Corrierce. Should however Your Excellency be of opinion that it is necessary to refer to that correspondenes I must her to be allowed to supplement ry request with a full statement of ry opinion on that correspondence.
4. (1). I have the honour to draw the Secretary of State's attention to the very unfavourable
conditions which now attach to the enjoyment of the Long Tacation of the Court by the
Chief Justice.
Owing to a misunderstanding, into the
details of which it is unnecessary to enter,
I did not know that the Chief Justice could
not leave the Colony during the Vacation of the Court without trenching on his vacation
leave. I was under the impression that
under rule of the Colonial Office Rules,
the Chief Justice was entitled to the usual
full-pay leave as a Civil Servant in addi-
-tion to the Court Trecation as the so-call-
-ed Long Vacation is under a month. The
question was raised in 1906, and this ruling
was given by the Secretary of State in
Despatch, which was communicated to me by
letter of 13th. November, 1906.
(2). I desire in the first place to point out
the result of this decision. It is well
understood