F
ه گریه میرسد باز به خانه خور
Tiro 8880 5 noorette 97sqe e al creid *A tarit ad of unsea sobi
Bani aint no yea of over 1 dan
.to becocelís e ban co boftro ad
at død,moltotbalur Lastotno ob ea vision? od IIaw na antings
#0.
13.
73
Your Excellency says in paragraph 7 of your
letter that the Officer Administering the Government before
do mo duroɗs quiddos werd hd
*e den T saldw rolleeup a al
your arrival made the suggestion that the Puisne Judge should
ta Ioaned bartoonco "even Jassi
& ESTIU m) gebreed not theen gero a “nitte0
at IT Tadalyte bas Tottollen vi stod,Snow To Lasb iseng
nesob a svad nap 19jeitsi a tout onågartt of sidiconqal stiup
york? .ankton altramom & je Jusrugia tot visør beer aid at a9969
fie ob of avad stehnoit bne,erotnuį, tuonti, ered drow of 97BNÍ
lo soɛam: gribner,aonso qu ontdoo! ¡sevføarent wøgburb ord
sit gaiqede bus drommne duo patárlat od nattibbe ni、ereqsq
to ethos Te Ndiw hengyang að of eval erotiatioa art Bra .eeno
¡eprisið Terito nenob a bus sonsbiva do eston Kit!w atnenpoob
enotna bra,Vbest cakeenjiw kładð dag að ovan vont !Is ovods
ITAlið svig of at
ni dnsdrogmt word avond memotrin erit avond ortw
Ver vert te it on tion ot emoo ct ens tedd new stab baxit
BOLAO *** Jonnas triton end ¡yinmibronne enotterwjang 11953 sdam
anilist sat ca exso ʼn dote mt neva bna ¡eseaandhu ant juodttv
edit of gntwo barwood VIJп909* 28 sako grof a to siquornt
vlisoltostrq e! di econółw z Baw ow yɗnat .: to deseb nohbue
4
blow di siquodd yntreeri tot aanso tanto sonsvbs of eidiaeoqmi
ob of bertsozon asidrag (ls to ejes¬stal sɗð not eď vitnebive
take all the Bankruptcy work permanently, that Mr. Wise express-
-ød his willingness to do so, but that "I objected to the
proposed arrangement". Er. Wise informs me that the reasons
which induced me to object were stated to the Officer Administer-
-ing the Government at the time, but they do not seem to have
been reported to Your Excellency. My objections to the proposal
were these;»
(1). That the interference of the Government in the distri-
-bution of the work of the Court was objectionable in principle;
and that what was proposed in this instance was quite in-
-sufficient to deal effectively with the difficulty. If the
Government deals with the matter I am of opinion that it must
be fully and effectively dealt with, and not in piecemeal
fashion.
(2). That the fact that the proposal had been made implied
that I was incapable of dealing with the difficulty in so far
as re-arrangement of business could deal with it; and that it
was no new idea, but merely one that I was myself at that time
trying, as Mr. Wise had undertaken the Bankruptcy work of the
08
Court