barsty ju ene threth 831 Moldy in star end trebleroo BW
lle nå squalo no to vallidedoni a al etone redtedw bre
savo mile al grey birov sten BÅND
od #7 of 3nso neg å nett snel en mi asinıq-
/ BEBLOUke but anlad
(3)
14 d. 16 ̃vy bid to enoti. oreg a nuttonbeb qd not bebivong
vi grinistrooks ni
- & ad bino. Arooni na dnoty wit to Batesonoq curiw Tobianos
on 1 urentu 4 no Man of thoioit-
ong desk. A
A
sú binow Nut Bóve
Fell bestuper those wit .as-
te veep nog Of vidsdorf .entale geq
nola graraes elit n0 .Juniortite
"2/0286" en nobles.oo of beiti÷ns
.Juso en Of acsI
of now fre"; molino foul ele
mis ant perfovel antal mob nolaivong 9:2 (a)
*** AL QIla el at sí? .vido.
50 00
bericusn sd
WInchon elcativa A to dremyoiq-
elleaog DA VÍZTASH es droɑsiq*
„bansite qxe ed of doeqxe
Nonvios not sui fem ui parlà bait ou aid?
stuns eine a cominus,&IN
vliettoon sIdncing a Voges blurora ev
-noq siendiku a no: I muidzot, bolite of oufer bae testejně to
-:nwob eval conanibтð oft
bna celoado Ei ioi:m sidst aeinsutsA ert (5)
.agatneo-
Venom grudark ant enclenqun cok yam 10 YAM
(8)
Kake oron nume con at mob.4000 70., &
„Jɛovně K80 JART ell! ki ghagnos são Mokriv te stat edt tied
birov Hollw,nolsunlar iarineng ten A (c)
delv sotkut oilt 10 tuco 194 06 Jusel ja tarit ussa vidiaɛoq
(coanoqze ni budioads od biuow cu imeny Jitong Toy OI a89% Qiw
.cnutoille vidødong al 3000
9. 04 no notalosh ent Jane Jasnava blow I
olle z bebis.b sú bipolla obert aww moicnulpy et doinw no alesd
naiofori andnuditua no TISUUDĀ Us Njiw nolėstivanou at tontevon
the diplomas of the British Institute.
212
Re Section 34 and 1st. Schedule, page 900. Section 34 provides
that any company having made a deposit in Great Britain shall
be exempt from the provisions of this ordinance. Such Companies
will, of course, make their returns to the Board of Frade
prescribed by the Act of 1870. The present ordinance calls for
particulars not required by the Act of 1870, and the information
thus called for might possibly be used to the detriment of
Eastern Companies by the unscrupulous use of the same in the
hands of agents of companies making a deposit in England. The
possibility of the unscrupulous use being made is a question
which is quite worthy of consideration and in this connexion I
would draw attention to the whole tenor of the discussion by
the Actuaries called before the Committee of the House of Lords
last year. The decision of the Committee arrived at was very
much influenced by considerations of this charafter whether or
not in the event of certain laws being made any company or
companies could be subjected to unfair competition.
In the First Schedule, Revenue Account, it
is necessary to divide the premiums into Premiums on New
Policies and Renewals, and also to divide the commission into
Commissions on 1st. premiums and commission on renewals: the
amount spent in advertising has also to be given, and in the
2nd. schedule the amount "Clains Resisted by the Company".
None of the above items are required by
the English Act of 1870, and it is not difficult to see that
the publication of these figures give the agents of competing
companies rather an unfair advantage so long as the agents of
the Eastern Companies are not in possession of the same
particulars with regard to their rivals. The publication of
these items seems to me to be an improvement on the English
Act, but would, I suggest, be better if not introduced in
Hongkong until it had been introduced at home.
There are I think two slips in the schedule
namely