508

668

.TORE,I^GA .df8¤‚prognof

as a...olo? es drogen ut honor end evad I

aldatze BA

vet be hurmat anodesup act of Bellver CAT

8e9n5net-00 £us anniЯ qalqqlab to reflasim

-:bito art to disq si

.II

-:ayo!!o? Re me notab:0

dreinemannoidantdmoo .

seiraquod auteqilë prora

A netaxa vox STA .(I)

cariðnetenebre to

salbue.'orso ante-tan

quoy Rebou \no100 ert ri afrog ceewter{ (a)

↑ tract5700

+

.....

*#

TUOY TABLU grofað allt al atroy noowded (d)

da ing wit ni afrog nedto bus troiozavod

sorttro0 e al e

BAY

CER to

bea

(get mort

bes ut*t*& fpero et

boristom rettantered) eɖo?* ("gonemetno robnoI” orit aa of

od Illw asti easy to tall A

-ronto badosata 9:43 ni berrot

{"A" ensofons) *ol-

send to apret trot a cafe et

al: noowded ontband asmif

edzot neenderA bora ymo.Coo

(Yrs.o0 mottentvak amt:10 ods

maliento A bre madesi erd .2.8

feniq

S.S. Company, and the North German Lloyd Company.

(c) between ports in the Colony under your Government and Foreign countries ?

Reply.

Yes. The London Conference, and a Conference of certain lines trading regularly with American Ports, chiefly New York, (hereinafter referred to as the "New York Conference"). A list of these lines will be found in the attached circular (enclosure *B*).

None of the above Conferences compete with the Local Companies for coast cargo. There is no Conference or other combination of Coasting Steamers.

(2). To what extent, if any, have Shipping Combinations tended to raise or maintain freights or passenger rates? In particular, have they tended to raise or maintain freights on goods carried ?

(a).between ports in the Colony under your Government ?

Reply.

No combinations, hence, no such tendency.

(b) between ports in the Colony under your Government and the United Kingdom or other parts of the British Empire ?

(c) between ports in the Colony under your Government and Foreign Countries ?

Reply

Share This Page