.Y 9 0 0

31

j

‚eelon Jaucü eftqua

.TORI UMGA „Las nosach

-160A4 JOY estelaounde oj neach and evad i

3o1Jamblia edu to Joebe odd ao fot8M .AJTS to "ojjel &'yonel-

10 Javaya *1 esjen sij Jordy retou elwn nid dedi ater I doin

cc parol ei .istages eu Liucda tentarajoi Jongeng je 21 #BİTE 162

grdered isorjitts Máj Jed Jesses Laucion, 40 ssenoxe Joue 1

djnos Jekt eJnevroć Livit of teales elus nit to burnos si doude

.,1987 Dijoideqaçɛ anoë « (burileox* quoy #ond tajiojio Jon esd

-39 noijesto ni sion add Jedd s***: me i

:

ence etan ejajó 10 (nejotos/ Old to eucidovnjeni od arilod- -emone adj Juodji lonelis od don fic 9clared the

1

50

CJ aidelned sár Jei escod 01 era i „301CURE ('SIRJE to vred- MUCY JBAJ,Jaetroue de 400; svet iLUN OUIJANJU went i libá* 10) BJP 1c nedenses adv cu Biuro CJ JI) Dena oved (oritmox@ Jrij Solose,nun edu to noruvorbitor & eculot)CY CJ DOLGE IN160 .Ji vo tajos11 jiauDITAƐ 08 07% %JarvÆG LIVIO \nem ça 701289ced eu fiunde Ji Jedi Jon594 1 sjucanje edd njia Wiline) me i Jeld yoarileox* quof enuses of -1301* quot telulord øved Jon kivoie i Jede ine

Joelola můj to to sirae jug thisa to nidruro eas dords norjzețive & ddis voost- sargneler au fejqots and jogelleck of as IC/joa & Miqșie oë JAAJ (Jilci28oq edj jai) esa 11IN (onelisoxa of neutel () DJ -Jilong Anda Júşın acıJBeup ni elur edd aecanje.bonic atxunso si must badever i Jud ¡towo0178vo Jon 28* Jnevič livi© cð ylde-

(5001180x3

100A1180** ein 0.4.0.1,,neiden weiJJe! 1& „JerdD-ar-netarumo tar noй"evoð

Excellency to view the question from a broader standpoint, which

the severe and unusual loss which its working produced last

month seemed to me to justify: viz - that a rule which could

produce so unsatisfactory a result must be inherently bad in

principle; and that an examination of the principle in fact

shewed it to be illogical and unsound.

4.

Your Excellency has been good enough to

have had a table prepared, which shows that if the system which

1 hal proposed had been in force from January to December, 1908,

the result would have been a loss to the Civil Servants. If Your

Excellency would have the table extended by only 3 months to

March, 1907, this result will be reversed, and the actual loss

from January, 1903, to March, 1907, woull be ascertained.

5.

-

I am confident that Your Excellency will see

on re-consideration that no sound inference in favour of the

existing rule can be drawn from the table: for it is based, #ith

the exception of the last 2 months, on a rising market, and,

with respect, it needs no table to show that when the silver

market is rising the rule results in a profit to the Civil

Servants: and that when the market is falling it results in a

loss. This profit and loss do not necessarily counter-balance one

another; indeed, the operation of the well-known fact that things

fail more rapidly than they rise is likely to make the loss

heavier than the gain.

8.

The point which I am anxious to impress

upon Your Excellency is that fluctuations of such a nature,

whether they be adverse or favourable to the Civil Servants,

should be avoided in the payment of salaries on account of the

element of uncertainty which they introduce in their financial

arrangements; and, in special relation to the question now under

discussion, that this artificial rule introduces a second and

unnecessary cause of fluctuation into a question which is already

sufficiently

Share This Page