2
i
1
Romaines umaltand
the Railway construction to the job which lut
Employment is not Equivalent to the
entry
be if such an en Mr Lucas
Kelly previously
heusimable
had
the latter
adi
former cannot.
h-
G
Bu
of he can't be reinstated by the Sanitarian dept without inconvenience
to be transferred to permanent
the angle Employment at this
the service.
Entres
L
14
1243
lir
Some other branch of
to the Court,
In civil proceedings?
indi ho 2 g 1889 §26(1) says
in boots
The conse
J
Las
account kept in the usual course of business, with such a
reasonable degree of regularity
shall be admissible in
evidence,
whenever they refer to a matter into which the Court has to enquire,
but shall not be sufficient
evidence to charge any person with liability."
If I enter in
accounts that I have paid Mr Lucas £5 that is all the evidence to show that Mr Lucas received it, what evidence is that against Mr Lucas
or law
or justice or common sense
my
charges? 82 ust.
A
appl tribunal?
sent 12-10
swed
Futter an
We
were
proof that £5? 565 Kony
as to the strong
the procedure in der Al is not civil but quasi-criminal procedure.
that
I am as
as sorry
as anyone
it should be made difficult to purge the
service
of
corruption, but there are
many guilty
men going about London now because legal evidence cannot be found to convict them though their moral guilt is certain.
Legal charges must be proved by
legal evidence.
13/3
We had better point
out clearly
and
Copy in
the file part 2 For Cox's
deshit in the cinces
tal, the J. of
stated in last para sentence
does not imply that further action is necessary
And
Jury
pastos
he asks for a reply. Alegrepli-
Referring to your tel. hats
barchilla
8
Kelly
"Await arrival of despatch Pt. 13/3
I hints that we
Shall
not lay emphasis on
the proceedings before the
of civil quasi-criminal in character. Very
It flows from it; and it leaves Bank
wing het.