PAG
. A
550
aldrikudue gif #vosert ra
11:00 Aviated dy is proud bae antwoq all of eg wi[{u^
A
28 WOLV N
*CH ME 120 1: CILLIA
Muco z mroind ivit (IF F047 vinawe
To undaco 11 30 291 JLO STU
→ as how the pe trdi 3 one traf ve pesanaJI. “J3 Prae
AC13-
so substantial that it is clearly evident that an enquiry before the Council has no parallel in the proceedings before a Court of Law.
A more exact analogy is furnished by the enquiry heil by a private employer into the conduct of a servant where he ray suspect the latter of making a secret profit to the prejudice of his Master so acting in breach of his implied contract for faithful service. Such Master is clearly not bound by the rules at any rate of Criminal evidence.
This is not to say that he day act arbitrari- -ly or capriciously for it without just cause he lischarges a servant without proper notice the latter has his remedy at law in
an action for wrongful dismissal. On such an action unless the
Master can justify the dismissal he may have to recompense the servant by the payment of damages.
PICT11 2006 Jacr 11 earunod
LOL.C.
TIGIGAITU 1:29 Dick 3 sent onun gec old ri rout
ན པ DAJ 4
will require:-
BINGO DES # 30
in reviewing the raster's action the Court
}
IVA I HE
JS 1
►
- 1000
Fox & Moles
BLA
i
N
30 J
(I)
i
1 co frit fan cdl a
f fe aciqu16100 Joanett
lawful evidence
(1). That he shoull have had before him some
and by lawful evidence I mean such as woull be
properly admitted by a Civil Court.
(2). That the evidence should be of such weight
that a reasonable man might fairly come to the conclusion on it.
The master did.
If either of these requirements be lacking
the Court will direct the jury to find in favour of the servant.
Supposing to take a particular instance
At t
AJ SPAJ
A 23: LUCINGU
.(*)
that Ward were an employé of a Mercantile Fire in the Colony and
that the partners were enquiring into his conduct in their
service.
1
j
It is necessary to point out an important
difference between the English Law of evidence and that which
obtains in this Colony.
Ιπ