I agree. But I also argue with
De Olivier
He circulated in
27439
county
as I think this
ineffective but
promote temptation.
Also widens the area of
M-Fiddes I kept this to speak
speaks
74
to Mr Olivier,
but he has not been able to attend
would circulate the
bit. I wish you would ask & find out if the general feeling is in favour of repealing the circular & if so who should put anything in place
Dr Cotan 2/5 Ir Lambert 4/5
hat Strachey I folded 7
13
My Harris 27 May
?
CPL
Cie. i.e. mail.
ve
29 Mar!
See above
the
Dr
than
29/4
ww/
Jayan!
wooly, I would withdraw it, saying that
As the
beyi
The instruction contained
to consideration
thin after to offer?
no
#
safe food a fault
I do not think that any case has
West Africa - But as N. Olivier's views
qe
supported by experience in stacking I should be willing
5 cancel the circular.
I do
+9
9.
agree
K-J.R. 7/5
Quo
to cancelling the
Circular of 19 Sept 1905,
rate in the but I
Cum
case
at
any
296
of the larger colonies,
that it might
not sure
not be returned in the
colonies Falklands
Case
Gibraltar and
cover
If small
like
(where we
had
a bad
with the
Postmaster
recently)
agree
with the last
Gul
13-5°
But I do not
sentence of Mr. Collins' minute
I
A
speculation in stamps which is totally unnecessarily
required
%
Han Am
may
1° the
Customs Pain that it
forbidden to face value in postage stamps
M
sec
. Sort Offices are
I do not think it would have had any experience of this section
#24/5
after that it could have been better if the
circular had been
Sme:
but I do not at all.
like the Malayan Early recall of standings; it does not look well - 1½ chipping & changing.
the and as there is no great harm done contrary to the Circular, I vote retaining the rules already expressed
ill almi!
o suggest leaving the
(at 27 May.")
Page 300
Page 301