HONG KONG

No. 11893

(Subject.)

Stauch Sealing

DESPATCH.

11892

RECEIVED 4 APR 07,

Compliance with directions in circular of 19 Sept 05 entails considerable additional clerical labour, thanks object arrived at could be attained by general order forbidding members of G.G. to deal in S.

44352

(Minutes.)

We Fiddes Luces

I would not make an exception on behalf of Colay to the rule, save that these requisitions should be routed through the C.S.O.

On 27439/00 Funeral Hill Oliver adduced cogent reasons against the Circular, but his minute seems to have missed fire.

It might be necessary to start circulating subsequent Paper.

PTO.

I think it would be invidious & undesirable to make an exception for one Blary. The proposed general order must stand, and that he can issue special order.

Graeme

BRJ574

Page 1

...

Page 1

becomes

HONG KONG

N°. 11893

(Subject.)

Stauch Sealing

1

295

DESPATCH.

11892 1

REGE 4 APR 07,

Compliance with directions in circular of 19 Sept 05 entails considerable additional clerical labour, thanks object arrived at could be attained by general order forbidding members of G.G. to deal in S.

44352

(Minutes.)

Wo Fiddes Luces

I wd not make an exception on behalf of Colay to the rule, save that these requisitions should be routed through the C.S.O.

On 27439/00 Funeral Hill Oliver adduced cogent reasons against the Circular, but his minute seems to have missed fire.

It might be necessary to start circulating subsequent Paper.

PTO.

I think it would be invidious & undesirable to make an exception for one Blary. The proposed general order must stand, and that he can issue special order.

Graeme

BRJ574

Page 363

...

Page 363

is not in the original text, hence the corrected response is

HONG KONG

N°. 11893

(Subject.)

Stauch Sealing

1

295

DESPATCH.

11892 1

RECEIVED 4 APR 07,

Compliance with directions in circular of 19 Sept 05 entails considerable additional clerical labour, thanks object arrived at could be attained by general order forbidding members of G.G. to deal in S.

44352

(Minutes.)

We Fiddes Luces

I would not make an exception on behalf of Colay to the rule, save that these requisitions should be routed through the C.S.O.

On 27439/00 Funeral Hill Oliver adduced cogent reasons against the Circular, but his minute seems to have missed fire.

It might be necessary to start circulating subsequent Paper.

PTO.

I think it would be invidious & undesirable to make an exception for one Blary. The proposed general order must stand, and that he can issue special order.

Graeme

BRJ574

Share This Page