became entitled to pension
29-
? Eshlar their to have
*
12.00
Ramsay that wrote according
to
the
was
dealt
The Reys, except
that the
Year
service must
By
to yrs residence,
Peast only conting
not
half. & there the man was
entitled to pension. & repeat it was not possible to make
nearly
any
further payment.
( Disease contracted in the foreign service, even if directly attributable to the nature of his duties" - is it an
"injury" within the
meaning of para. 12 of the Regs?
318
CPL &
at once
315
SCOTTISH OFF
C731 27687
WHITE, 20. JUL 06
27th July, 1906.
Dear Mr. Fiddian,
The enclosed correspondence
has been brought under Mr. Sinclair's notice. He will be very glad if you will bring it before Lord Elgin for
his consideration.
Yours faithfully,
Mur Conacher
+
Bright's disease, probably...
A. Fiddian, Esq.