the
3.
the nature of the
In the case
jv Helena
the
magistrate, who tried
the case
decided that
special not existed
accordingly convicted the (April 15th) on
crew. (April 18th), however, sing
a similar
charge brought again!
the crew of the S.S. "Helena"
was dismissed
found that
the
in view of the
proximity of belligerent ships, special risk, not
caused by
the Christ apert did
I first & in
that it was
that the for
it s
infoed.
in this decision.
in the exercising this
discretion released the
crew the St Helena
about April 20th
(Signed) C. P. LUCAS.
Last previous Paper.
1, (78) – 17-11-5
Next subsequent Paper
HONG KONG
No/360
(Subject.)
St Helena
666
DOMESTIC,
13601
RES
REL 19 APR 06
Asker whether the court which passed
sentence was competent to try the off.
har Suley
(Minutes.)
the men
charged under S. 578) of Hagting
M. S. Order, which reproduces
Section 225-
11894.
the M-S. Act
An offender in
liable to be punished Summarily
for Hageland who convicted
them is
Mr. Fodder
affiamaters.
So reply J.J.R.
Tig/+
Police Magistrate.
Reply
that in
alonce
the
2014