246
these transactions should be considered on its merits.
may have been desirable in the cases mentioned in order to
encourage the development of out-lying or undeveloped dis-
tricts to allow such conversion, but no such conversion
took place as a matter of right.
15.
Similarly any offer of conversion made by
the Government ten years ago to the husband of the Petitioner
(now deceased) and refused by him cannot now be consid-
ered to be binding on the Government, seeing that the
dependency of Kowloon has developed to an extraordinary
extent in the interval.
16.
It is also true that in 1904 the Government
sold Inland Lot No. 1157 at a premium of 30 cents a square
foot for a term of seventy-five years renewable for a
further term of the like period; but this sale forms no
basis of comparison with the area now under consideration
as the lot is a building lot of moderate area and con-
venient shape for building purposes, and is laid out with
public streets along two sides of it, close to the main
road from Yaumati to Kowloon City, whereas Farm Lot No. 4
can only be reached by native paths and is much less
favourably situated than Inland Lot 1157.
17.
The Petitioner refers in the Petition to
certain