the lien pretini tar dusk m. 224
den, mediante neon.
(1) end 1:
DSM: 1.
of.
V366
Via TBBCOON
Nild. India Trecuts els
DUR SI JI
་།
900 = 1 efercaurs
* me medio add a 278901)
+
eion Sa
*"prey at tedd entuang Ye to enc{-
BACA JRAQ Thouk And Pi iam niy Lae 16800 alle 2297501
܂
I A
add not "alw
X
Pute
ers festmt au! „OCIJELJAMstr LePromont brolle
102 Jeniaze 2p "6, '90 x "2,18% 9G IILO# 37BOO
VITELLO Fuell eventus bridens 2 4 19:50 11*%2
(PACITIV
BOE ITAQ 800 6108
1 1 0 0
28
Offices) is 38' 9' x 23'.10".
'D' and 'G' are analogous proposals differ-
-ing only in detail from each other.
They provide for a library on the best front
of the building where the pediment with the figure of justice
is situated. This would interfere to some extent with the light-
-ing of the large court, but it can be overcome in great measure
by providing suitable skylights in the roof of the Library.
I am of opinion that proposals 'A' and 'B'
should be discarded and that either 'C' or 'D' should be carried
out. With regard to 'C', I understand that it is unnecessary
that the Third Court should be equipped as a Criminal Court. The
floor-space will therefore not be occupied by a dock for pri-
-soners and need not be so extensive as in the case of the other
two courts. As regards 'D', the sketch plan shows three stair-
-cases extending to the top floor. I think the one at the West
end of the Second Court might be omitted. This will leave two
staircases, diagonally opposite each other.
It is important that the scheme to be carri-
-ed out should be settled as soon as possible and I would ask that
the Architects be instructed to communicate their decision by
wire, giving the reference letter of the one to be adopted.
(Sd.) A. Chatham,
Director of Public Works.
23rd October, 1906.