30674
In fish instemmen litepens Lad
daylike
hoeing
Your compl. desp 13 July foreshore
paragraph ten line two
ark 1618
is west correct
al once
You
1678
I sent this til. because - if it
Dr Lucas
if it were
a
Ran 30374
cofgisticrror
Lang
it turns out
Blue
hermaffling have tried to prin
trot-
intended.
I don't think that.
the W.. light'
Sir M. Nathan churn for
it
I need summarize
this if you read it with the accompanying chert.
behang Sir M. N's arguments sproposals are begory
She is also
a
voldier-belonging
perfectly clear. tot intelligent branch his profession
and is
start
altogether unlikely to forous anything lett weaken the defences of St. Kong. His altetende seems tove to be perfectly reasonable, & I think we the strongly support it.
I won day nothing about the Eves attitude
at this stace. We can
the keenness of Sighting
Make
all awek
for
L
Cont
з
and this
device
behalf of views that don't comment
Hemselves to civilians, but from
all that we
two Gene Hatton seems & destructive We
have seen in the lash year or
hostile
to be
Generally
hash
to and the S. ns. to represent this two. (+) wirte.
鐵
511
I a
hint Ad be given other privatif)
but the time for this hasn't come get.
من
Nor can we dijent of the W.0. Consulting
the EMC who will be home shortly
If herewith.
? Writ
6-7
17.
Dr. CP-7
at mcd