Kagram Filegrafla
I replied 4
in Deer gtt
they desparde (N° 349) in the 15th Subsequently
If he graphed & you. in Dec 19h. asking
you
4m 65 scopand action with regard wall the cantines specifiol
my first filegram
except Brazil, on
wel
come
4.
Flagran
(
their
tot. re-considered,
The reas an
ities
for that
the last session ftu
Sugar
Comincission astain
Countries whe
adjudicated
приа
арт
fromanced 6
ما
al.
h. bounty-giving but H..
Look
tax appealed against t
decisions in
tie
229
the countries, exud
Jall Brazil, speisfied
sxccept Deazel (
first emlos me despatch No 347K
ground that case of
no
M
the
the
the
2.contracting
State it was not sufficient
to show that the surtat exceeded the limits
fixed by the Carvention
but that it was
nas necessary
also to shew that
Such surtat resulted
in
to result in,
bounty.
likely
The consideration If there appeals stands