CO129-331 - Public Offices - 1905 — Page 539

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

532

that, according to a telegram received from the Viceroy at Canton, His Majesty's Consul-General was some time since informed of the conclusion to raise capital locally, and that you saw no reason therefore for appointing an official to enter into negotiations with the representative of the British and Chinese Corporation.

I confess that the contents of this Note surprise me. As your Highness is aware, there is a Preliminary Agreement in regard to this matter which was concluded by the British and Chinese Corporation with His Excellency Sheng Hsuan-huai, on behalf of the Chinese Government, on March 28th, 1899; and what I am asking for is the fulfilment of this agreement. Yet, unless I misjudge the contents of Your Highness' Note, both you and the Viceroy of Canton, on the pretext that the proposals contained in my memorandum of April 26th do not accord with the Preliminary Agreement, consider its provisions null and void, clearly because some Cantonese notables and merchants wish you to do so. Am I to understand that Your Highness and the Viceroy of Canton seriously think that in deference to the wishes of local persons anxious to profit themselves, it is open to the Chinese Government to repudiate a solemn agreement regardless of the views of the other party to the agreement? I am aware that opinions of this nature are ventilated in the Chinese press, but if they are held by the Chinese Government or by the Viceroy of Canton with the approval of the Chinese Government, I should be glad to be told so officially for the information of His Majesty's Government.

It is moreover astonishing to me that Your Highness should seriously allege any portion of the contents of my memorandum of April 26th, which are mere proposals, as a sufficient reason for abrogating the Preliminary Agreement of 1899, which is a signed and sealed contract.

Your Highness says that the division of the railway into two sections, the Kowloon section to be built by the Hongkong Government, and the Canton section by the British and Chinese Corporation for the Chinese...

Edit History

2026-06-24 07:40:00 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
532that, according to a telegram received from the Viceroy at Canton, His Majesty's Consul-General was some time since informed of the conclusion to raise capital locally, and that you saw no reason therefore for appointing an official to enter into negotiations with the representative of the British and Chinese Corporation.I confess that the contents of this Note surprise me. As your Highness is aware, there is a Preliminary Agreement in regard to this matter which was concluded by the British and Chinese Corporation with His Excellency Sheng Hsuan-huai, on behalf of the Chinese Government, on March 28th, 1899; and what I am asking for is the fulfilment of this agreement. Yet, unless I misjudge the contents of Your Highness' Note, both you and the Viceroy of Canton, on the pretext that the proposals contained in my memorandum of April 26th do not accord with the Preliminary Agreement, consider its provisions null and void, clearly because some Cantonese notables and merchants wish you to do so. Am I to understand that Your Highness and the Viceroy of Canton seriously think that in deference to the wishes of local persons anxious to profit themselves, it is open to the Chinese Government to repudiate a solemn agreement regardless of the views of the other party to the agreement? I am aware that opinions of this nature are ventilated in the Chinese press, but if they are held by the Chinese Government or by the Viceroy of Canton with the approval of the Chinese Government, I should be glad to be told so officially for the information of His Majesty's Government.It is moreover astonishing to me that Your Highness should seriously allege any portion of the contents of my memorandum of April 26th, which are mere proposals, as a sufficient reason for abrogating the Preliminary Agreement of 1899, which is a signed and sealed contract.Your Highness says that the division of the railway into two sections, the Kowloon section to be built by the Hongkong Government, and the Canton section by the British and Chinese Corporation for the Chinese...
Baseline (Original)
532that, according to a telegram received from the Viceroy at Canton, His Majesty's Consul-General was some time since informed of the conclusion to raise capital locally, and that you saw no reason there-fore for appointing an official to enter into nego-tiations with the representative of the British and Chinese Corporation.I confess that the contents of this Note Bur-prise me. As your Highness is aware there is a Preliminary Agreement in regard to this matter which was concluded by the British and Chinese Corporation with His Excellency Sheng Hsuan-huai, on behalf of the Chinese Government, on March 28th, 1899; and what I am asking for is the fulfilment of this agree-ment. Yet, unless I misjudge the contents of Your Highness' Note, both you and the Viceroy of Canton, on the pretext that the proposals contained in my memorandum of April 26th do not accord with the Pre-liminary Agreement, consider its provisions null and void, clearly because some Cantonese notables and merchants wish you to do so. Am I to understand thatthat Your Highness and the Viceroy of Canton serious-ly think that in deference to the wishes of local persone anxious to profit themselves it is open to the Chinese Government to repudiate a solemn agree-ment regardless of the views of the other party to the agreement? I am aware that opinions of this nature are ventilated in the Chiness press, but if they are held by the Chinese Government or by the Viceroy of Canton with the approval of the Chinese Government, I should be glad to be told so officially for the information of His Majesty's Government.It is moreover astonishing to me that Your High-ness should seriously allege any portion of the con-tents of my memorandum of April 26th, which are mere proposals, as a sufficient reason for abrogating the Preliminary Agreement of 1899, which is a signed and sealed contract.Your Highness says that the division of the railway into two sections the Kowloon section to be built by the Hongkong Government, and the Canton sec-tion by the British and Chinese Corporation for the Chinesey
2026-06-24 07:40:00 · Baseline
View content

532

that, according to a telegram received from the

Viceroy at Canton, His Majesty's Consul-General was

some time since informed of the conclusion to raise

capital locally, and that you saw no reason there-

fore for appointing an official to enter into nego-

tiations with the representative of the British and

Chinese Corporation.

I confess that the contents of this Note Bur-

prise me. As your Highness is aware there is a

Preliminary Agreement in regard to this matter which

was concluded by the British and Chinese Corporation

with His Excellency Sheng Hsuan-huai, on behalf of

the Chinese Government, on March 28th, 1899; and

what I am asking for is the fulfilment of this agree-

ment. Yet, unless I misjudge the contents of Your

Highness' Note, both you and the Viceroy of Canton,

on the pretext that the proposals contained in my

memorandum of April 26th do not accord with the Pre-

liminary Agreement, consider its provisions null and

void, clearly because some Cantonese notables and

merchants wish you to do so. Am I to understand

that

that Your Highness and the Viceroy of Canton serious-

ly think that in deference to the wishes of local

persone anxious to profit themselves it is open to

the Chinese Government to repudiate a solemn agree-

ment regardless of the views of the other party to

the agreement? I am aware that opinions of this

nature are ventilated in the Chiness press, but if

they are held by the Chinese Government or by the

Viceroy of Canton with the approval of the Chinese

Government, I should be glad to be told so officially

for the information of His Majesty's Government.

It is moreover astonishing to me that Your High-

ness should seriously allege any portion of the con-

tents of my memorandum of April 26th, which are mere

proposals, as a sufficient reason for abrogating the

Preliminary Agreement of 1899, which is a signed and

sealed contract.

Your Highness says that the division of the

railway into two sections the Kowloon section to be

built by the Hongkong Government, and the Canton sec-

tion by the British and Chinese Corporation for the

Chinese

y

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.