CO129-331 - Public Offices - 1905 — Page 151

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

CONFIDENTIAL

No. 1

India Office to Foreign Office.~(Received July 6.)

India Office, July 5, 1905.

I am directed by the Secretary of State for India in Council to acknowledge the receipt of your letter, dated the 8th May, communicating Sir E. Satow's view of the intention of clause 5 of the Additional Article of the Chefoo Convention.

In reply, I am to say that Mr. Secretary Brodrick concurs with Lord Lansdowne that, so long as the provisions of the Article are disregarded, as in the two instances referred to towards the end of Sir E. Satow's letter, His Majesty's Government should refuse to consider the proposals of the Imperial Government for raising revenue from opium taxation at Canton.

I am, &c.

(Signed)

A. GODLEY

[2084 ƒ-2]

Edit History

2026-06-24 06:18:57 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

CONFIDENTIAL No. 1 India Office to Foreign Office.~(Received July 6.) India Office, July 5, 1905. I am directed by the Secretary of State for India in Council to acknowledge the receipt of your letter, dated the 8th May, communicating Sir E. Satow's view of the intention of clause 5 of the Additional Article of the Chefoo Convention. In reply, I am to say that Mr. Secretary Brodrick concurs with Lord Lansdowne that, so long as the provisions of the Article are disregarded, as in the two instances referred to towards the end of Sir E. Satow's letter, His Majesty's Government should refuse to consider the proposals of the Imperial Government for raising revenue from opium taxation at Canton. I am, &c. (Signed) A. GODLEY [2084 ƒ-2]

Baseline (Original)

25853 [July 6.] SECTION 2. 148 his Document is the Property of His Britannic Majesty's Government.j HINA TRADE. ONFIDENTIAL. No. 1. India Office to Foreign Office.~(Received July 6.) India Office, July 5, 1905. IAM directed by the Secretary of State for India in Council to acknowledge the ceipt of your letter, dated the 8th May, communicating Sir E. Satow's view of the tention of clause 5 of the Additional Article of the Chefoo Convention. In reply, I am to say that Mr. Secretary Brodrick concurs with Lord Lansdowne at, so long as the provisions of the Article are disregarded, as in the two instances eferred to towards the end of Sir E. Satow's letter, His Majesty's Government should refuse to consider the proposals of the Imperial Government for raising revenue from opinm taxation at Cantón. I am, &c. (Signed) A. GODLEY. [2084 ƒ-2]

2026-06-24 06:18:57 · Baseline

View content

25853

[July 6.]

SECTION 2.

148

his Document is the Property of His Britannic Majesty's Government.j

HINA TRADE.

ONFIDENTIAL.

No. 1.

India Office to Foreign Office.~(Received July 6.)

India Office, July 5, 1905.

IAM directed by the Secretary of State for India in Council to acknowledge the ceipt of your letter, dated the 8th May, communicating Sir E. Satow's view of the tention of clause 5 of the Additional Article of the Chefoo Convention.

In reply, I am to say that Mr. Secretary Brodrick concurs with Lord Lansdowne at, so long as the provisions of the Article are disregarded, as in the two instances eferred to towards the end of Sir E. Satow's letter, His Majesty's Government should refuse to consider the proposals of the Imperial Government for raising revenue from opinm taxation at Cantón.

I am, &c.

(Signed)

A. GODLEY.

[2084 ƒ-2]

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.