7
?
unfor
70 Tras
I should think
Some Dept
in 7.0. is ignorant of the
discussion going
to
the functions of
Mor Cap
quite clear
57A
consuls
а
7.
4/4
The only thing that seems
is that the question
て
making shortages from the men's allowanc Can't be left in abeyance, the the and o
he was.
We showed have dry better tound 976, when its pist came in, to 6.0. daging kit it afternsthan been
adresses Boom in ever.
Sezə Iond now send
the compuestos with Frears &
8.0.1.2.0. saging that as
·7
Trea
the
ain
-31135
Jos.
matter does not appear to concern a
the 5.2.8.
the Cot fork head
چي
begled if the Wad. w. quine the pagemart
que instruction
In Niblett
Srea
hase
ay
4 1514 ausly
the think fib
Japee
B
atome
HPL
-4/4
Sir: -
RINTER
C.0.
10787
Ard 4 APR 05
Rec
FOREIGN OFFICE,
OR US
Tastern 93
April
1905.
*1#
COLONIAL
OFFICE
442
I laid before the Marquess of Lansdowne your letter
9092/1905 of the 25th ultimo, 'respecting the hospital
charges to members of the crew of the Russian destroyer
"Burni" now interned at Hongkong.
I am directed to state, in reply, that Lord Lans-
downe concurs in the proposal of the Lords Commission-
ers of the Treasury that the Russian Consul at Hongkong
should be consulted as to whether the Russian Govern-
ment are prepared to accept as a charge against them
the full cost of the issues made to the men in hospital,
with or without stoppages from their money allowances.
I am however to call your attention to the letter
from this Office of September 6th, 1904 and to say
that Lord Lansdowne is of opinion that in view of the
circumstances the matter might be left in abeyance
pending the conclusion of the war, when the claim for
Under Secretary of State,
Colonial Office.
+ 11⁄2 3115--3-
the