::5
ANE BO NIEVO :
190 140
OPY.
D.W.6434/1904.
Commodore Dicken to
Officer Administering the Government.
No. 906.
Sir,
"Tamar" at Hong Kong,
9th March 1904.
17
one 16 lei del
201100 BIDIVEƊq une Šuadual 1989
WONT A AVÈ. Jadi deg nasini og avonoi
VSISTELBA ed: to ato exting an
And I ESEN DI& exs
I
and W
Jeong vi vivacia zDTUW
Dette elesel panel
Dwu95124 glasot atsi ed yam Holdv"
Mesto AlNow thenoneq on dads boulverq"
betautunee ed II alles ·atniate"
"I
.hgor.
to des) (05) *** mistic"
DULA BAYA
bernel gatna
Lammo, one ste H
TO OU BON Jesu, en da wonod er
Du TedavON IJSL ess to reste.[
DA
20 I
18 qus bl. 3* ***del woy
no coe Mo en svart I end bowl Istmo 10
mbas de Jadd bobivonų nottalegide roy
-Vi
(a)
A beat dere gatworz
In reply to your Excellency's letter to my
predecessor, No. 1656/1899 - 0.5.0./, of 30th January
1904, I have the honour to inform you that the amendment
to Sir Henry Blake's letter of 12th November last, which
is contained in the first paragraph of your letter under
reply, appears to meet the objection raised by my
predecessor, I am therefore submitting the question to the
Admiralty with a recommendation that Sir Henry Blake's
proposal, as amended, should be adopted. In the event of
the proposal being approved the refund of the sum of
$1,092, paid to the Colonial Goverment for this
unoccupied area, would not be necessary.
2.
With regard to paragraph 3 of your
Excellency's letter, I have the honour to enclose a plan
showing the approach road, as now existing, which traverses
part of the area referred to in paragraph V. I understand
that in the event of the Colonial Government wishing to
resume occupation of the area in which this road is
included, an equally convenient road will be provided
without expense to the Admiralty.
Regarding the suggestion as to encroachment,
I would observe that a right of way over the ground in
question was granted with the lease of I.L.1590 of 7th
May 1900.
(sd)
I have &c.
C.G.Dicken,
Commodore.