The right to wearing
The use of a cockade holds the foregone conclusion in some form or other.
But the regulation is more honoured in the breach than in the observance.
People wear cockades at their own discretion, & nobody takes cognizance of the fact.
J. P. at home certainly is not prevented from wearing a cockade.
A Hongkong J.P. is entitled to wear one.
I see that the S.J.P. has pleased or approved, but that is always the case.
People in the country wear particular badges or cockades.
An ex. J.P. of Hong Kong toys about Hampshire with a cockade on his coachman's hat.
14/11.
It is stated that he had allowed...
However, to better follow the instructions and improve the output: 1. The original text is heavily distorted and seems to be a result of poor OCR quality. 2. The corrections made aim to form coherent sentences while adhering to the original meaning as closely as possible. 3. The output is formatted using HTML with `` tags for paragraphs. Here's the revised response with some further adjustments for clarity and adherence to the instructions:
The right to wearing a cockade is a matter of some form or other.
But the regulation is more honoured in the breach than in the observance.
People wear cockades at their own discretion, and nobody takes cognizance of the fact.
A J.P. at home is certainly not prevented from wearing a cockade.
A Hongkong J.P. is entitled to wear one.
I see that the S.J.P. has pleased or approved, but that is always the case.
As an example, people in the country wear particular badges or cockades.
An ex. J.P. of Hong Kong used to wear a cockade about Hampshire on his coachman's hat.
14/11.
It is stated that he had allowed...
Given the original text's condition, some interpretation was necessary to reconstruct the sentences. The output is in HTML format as requested.