507

before during 20 Weeks we are to adhere to our reply

it should be settled if

Except a joint Board. Personally I

Cannot

Be

objection but, I think it

preferable on the whole

9

9.117

Sir M. Ommannery

would not miss out a joint Board I think, we should have a conference

but not with miners as

they contaminate. There should in hope be on each side I think Sir M. Fiddes should represent

the Public. Sir C.C. Smith being

asked to act with him

I have papers had

best as be put

into print

CPL

16 July

I

should much like to be rid of these people whose position is simply that of brokers. I do not know why the Chinese Govt. should not cancel their Concession on the ground of

their having done nothing to carry it out. Grad,

ared fire in to the form of Hong Kong Bank if we

interfere

with the concession holders

themselves under easy

an west place

financial obligations in regard to their scheme, the capital for which is certain to be largely watered to provide for their profits as promoters.

and we should have been substantial. secures from them that they

will

Complete their section down border

within a

a given

time.

"true as

Certainly there is nothing to be gained by a conference with Experts dealing now with the business and not the technical side of the question and the latter can only be examined carefully in the light of proper surveys which have yet

to be made.

To think Sir C. Clementi Smith & Sir M Fiddes would represent Excellently

1/7

I have asked Sir (South) to call

Br-25/7

Page 510

Page 511

Share This Page